The Lava Blaze series aims to deliver affordable smartphones with decent features. The Blaze Pro and Blaze 2 are two contenders in this space, but which one offers the better value? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their specs, performance, and overall user experience to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Lava Blaze 2 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its faster processor (Unisoc Tiger T616), significantly quicker 18W charging, and potentially improved camera performance. While the Blaze Pro is a decent option, the Blaze 2's upgrades make it a more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 20 | 2023, April 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 20 | Available. Released 2023, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 165 x 76.1 x 8.6 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
VGA | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Green, Blue, Orange | Glass Blue, Glass Black, Glass Orange |
| Models | LZX404 | LZX409 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 100 EUR |
Lava Blaze Pro
- Potentially lower price
- Decent battery life
- Standard feature set
- Slower processor
- Slow charging (10W)
- Potentially less impressive camera
Lava Blaze 2
- Faster processor (Unisoc T616)
- Faster charging (18W)
- Potentially better camera
- Smoother performance
- Slightly higher price (likely)
- May lack some niche features
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). However, the Blaze 2 might have slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to potential panel upgrades. We'll need to confirm specific display specs for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup, the Blaze 2's newer chipset might enable better image processing and potentially improved low-light performance. Expect the Blaze 2 to offer slightly better image quality and more features. Specific camera specs (megapixel counts, aperture values) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Blaze 2's Unisoc Tiger T616 with its Cortex-A75 cores offers a noticeable performance advantage over the Blaze Pro's Helio G37. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a better gaming experience on the Blaze 2. The Blaze Pro's Helio G37 is adequate for basic tasks but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Blaze 2's 18W charging is a significant advantage over the Blaze Pro's 10W charging. This means faster charging times and potentially more convenient usage. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so the Blaze 2 will charge much quicker.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze Pro is a good option for users prioritizing a slightly lower price point and are not heavily reliant on fast charging or demanding performance. The Lava Blaze 2 is ideal for those seeking a smoother user experience, faster charging, and potentially better camera capabilities, even within a budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Lava Blaze 2 worth the extra money compared to the Blaze Pro?
Yes, the Blaze 2's faster processor and charging speed make it a worthwhile upgrade for most users, especially if performance and convenience are important.
❓ What kind of games can I play on these phones?
Both phones can handle basic games, but the Blaze 2 will provide a smoother experience with more demanding titles. Don't expect high-end gaming performance from either device.
