The Lava Blaze and Blaze Pro are both aiming for the budget smartphone market, offering attractive features at affordable prices. But which one delivers the best value? This comprehensive comparison dives deep into their specs, performance, and overall user experience to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Lava Blaze Pro emerges as the clear winner thanks to its more powerful Helio G37 chipset, offering noticeably better performance and a smoother experience. While both are budget options, the Pro's improved processing power justifies its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, September 20 | 2022, July 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, September 20 | Available. Released 2022, July 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
VGA | 13 MP, (wide), AF
Other unspecified cameras |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Gold, Green, Blue, Orange | Green, Red, Black, Blue |
| Models | LZX404 | LZX403, LZX411 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 110 EUR |
Lava Blaze Pro
- More powerful processor (Helio G37)
- Better multitasking performance
- Potentially improved camera processing
- Slightly better battery efficiency (potentially)
- Slightly higher price
- Charging speed is slow (10W)
Lava Blaze
- More affordable
- Decent battery life
- Reliable for basic tasks
- Less powerful processor (Helio A22)
- Slower performance
- May struggle with demanding apps
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely HD+). The Blaze Pro *might* have slightly better color accuracy or brightness due to its newer chipset, but this is not definitively confirmed without specific display specs. Expect similar viewing experiences.
Camera Comparison
While both phones likely have similar camera setups (likely a primary sensor, macro, and depth sensor), the Blaze Pro's more powerful processor could lead to slightly better image processing and low-light performance. Expect decent image quality from both, but don't expect flagship-level results.
Performance
This is where the Blaze Pro shines. The Helio G37 is a significant upgrade over the Helio A22. Expect faster app loading times, smoother gaming, and better overall responsiveness on the Blaze Pro. The Blaze will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with demanding apps or multitasking.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a similar battery capacity (around 5000mAh). However, the Blaze Pro's more efficient chipset *could* offer slightly better battery life, although this is dependent on usage patterns. Both should easily last a full day on moderate use.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance and a smoother multitasking experience, even on a budget. The Lava Blaze is a good choice for those seeking a basic, reliable smartphone for essential tasks and are extremely budget-conscious.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Lava Blaze Pro worth the extra money?
If you value performance and a smoother user experience, the Blaze Pro is definitely worth the extra investment. The Helio G37 makes a noticeable difference.
❓ What kind of games can I play on the Lava Blaze?
The Lava Blaze can handle basic games, but you may experience lag or reduced graphics settings in more demanding titles. The Blaze Pro is better suited for gaming.
