The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and Lava is vying for a piece of the pie with the Blaze Nxt and Blaze 2. Both offer attractive features at affordable prices, but which one truly delivers the best value? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Lava Blaze 2 emerges as the clear winner thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful CPU core configuration, and likely improved overall performance. While the Blaze Nxt is a decent option, the Blaze 2's upgrades make it the better choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, November 25 | 2023, April 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, December 02 | Available. Released 2023, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) | 165 x 76.1 x 8.6 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203.5 g (7.20 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8320 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 64GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Triple | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP
VGA | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Ion 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glass Blue, Glass Red, Glass Green | Glass Blue, Glass Black, Glass Orange |
| Models | - | LZX409 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 100 EUR |
Lava Blaze Nxt
- Potentially lower price
- Decent battery life
- Standard feature set
- Slower charging
- Less powerful processor
- May struggle with demanding tasks
Lava Blaze 2
- Faster 18W charging
- More powerful CPU (Cortex-A75 cores)
- Smoother performance
- Likely better future-proofing
- Potentially slightly higher price
- Camera performance may not be significantly better
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely FHD+). Screen size is likely around 6.5 inches. Differences in color accuracy and brightness are difficult to ascertain without testing, but the Blaze 2 might have a slight edge due to potentially better panel calibration.
Camera Comparison
Camera specifications are likely similar, with both phones featuring a multi-lens setup (likely a primary sensor, macro, and depth sensor). Image quality will depend heavily on software processing. The Blaze 2's more powerful processor *could* allow for slightly better image processing and potentially better low-light performance, but this is speculative without direct comparison.
Performance
The Blaze 2's Unisoc Tiger T616 boasts two Cortex-A75 cores, which are significantly faster than the Cortex-A53 cores found in the Blaze Nxt's Helio G37. This translates to noticeably smoother multitasking, app loading, and overall responsiveness on the Blaze 2. The Blaze Nxt will handle basic tasks adequately, but may struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Blaze 2's 18W fast charging is a major advantage over the Blaze Nxt's 10W charging. This means significantly faster charging times and more convenience. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so real-world battery life should be comparable, but the Blaze 2's faster charging makes it the winner in this category.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze Nxt is a good option for users prioritizing a slightly lower price point and are not heavily reliant on performance. The Lava Blaze 2 is ideal for those seeking faster charging, smoother performance for everyday tasks, and a more future-proof experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the processors in the Lava Blaze Nxt and Blaze 2?
The Blaze 2 uses a Unisoc Tiger T616 with two Cortex-A75 cores, which are significantly faster than the Cortex-A53 cores in the Blaze Nxt's Helio G37. This results in better performance on the Blaze 2.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Lava Blaze 2?
The Lava Blaze 2 supports 18W fast charging, while the Blaze Nxt only supports 10W charging. This means the Blaze 2 will charge considerably faster.
