The sub-$200 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Lava Blaze Duo and Micromax In 2b both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, but they take drastically different approaches to achieving this. The Blaze Duo leverages a more modern and powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7025 chipset, while the In 2b opts for the more affordable Unisoc T610. This comparison dives deep into the implications of these choices, examining performance, charging, and overall value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Lava Blaze Duo is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 7025 chipset provides a significant performance uplift over the Micromax In 2b’s Unisoc T610, translating to smoother multitasking and a more responsive user experience. The 33W charging is a game-changer, drastically reducing charge times compared to the In 2b’s slow 10W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 10 | 2021, July 30. Released 2021, August 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, December 20 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 162.4 x 73.9 x 8.5 mm (6.39 x 2.91 x 0.33 in) | 164.3 x 75.7 x 8.6 mm (6.47 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 186 g (6.56 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm) | Unisoc T610 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG BXM-8-256 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| OS | Android 14, planned upgrade to Android 15 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro) | 13 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2 |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Unspecified |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Arctic White, Celestial Blue | Blue, Black, Green |
| Models | - | E7544 |
| Price | ₹ 14,299 | About 90 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.85 W/kg (head) 1.13 W/kg (body) |
Lava Blaze Duo
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- 33W fast charging drastically reduces charging times
- More efficient 6nm chipset for better battery life
- Likely a higher price point than the Micromax In 2b
- Specific display details are currently unknown
Micromax In 2b
- More affordable price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Acceptable performance for light usage
- Slow 10W charging is a major inconvenience
- Unisoc T610 chipset struggles with demanding apps
- Less efficient 12nm process impacts battery life
Display Comparison
Neither Lava nor Micromax provide display specifications beyond size. However, the chipset difference suggests a potential disparity in display capabilities. The Dimensity 7025 in the Blaze Duo is capable of driving higher resolution and refresh rate panels, hinting at a potentially sharper and smoother visual experience. The Unisoc T610 in the In 2b is likely paired with a more basic display, prioritizing cost savings over visual fidelity. Without specific nit brightness or color gamut data, it's difficult to make a definitive statement, but the chipset suggests the Blaze Duo has the headroom for a superior display.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable for either device. However, given the price points, it’s reasonable to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. The focus should be on image processing capabilities, which are heavily tied to the chipset. The Dimensity 7025’s integrated image signal processor (ISP) is significantly more advanced than the Unisoc T610’s, enabling better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality. While megapixel counts may be similar, the Blaze Duo is likely to produce more visually appealing photos, particularly in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Lava Blaze Duo’s Mediatek Dimensity 7025, built on a 6nm process, features a more modern CPU architecture – specifically, two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Micromax In 2b’s Unisoc T610, utilizing older Cortex-A75 cores at 1.8 GHz and Cortex-A55 cores also at 1.8 GHz, fabricated on a less efficient 12nm node. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 7025 translates to better power efficiency and less heat generation, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. Gamers and power users will find the Blaze Duo significantly more capable.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the charging speeds tell a crucial story. The Lava Blaze Duo’s 33W wired charging is a massive advantage over the Micromax In 2b’s 10W charging. This means the Blaze Duo can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. Even if the In 2b has a slightly larger battery capacity, the slower charging speed will likely result in a less convenient user experience. The 33W charging on the Blaze Duo allows for a significant top-up in a short amount of time, ideal for users who are constantly on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Blaze Duo if you prioritize performance, fast charging, and a smoother overall experience, even if it means spending a bit more. This phone is ideal for users who enjoy mobile gaming, frequently multitask, or simply want a phone that feels responsive. Buy the Micromax In 2b if your primary concern is absolute affordability and you only need a phone for basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media use. The In 2b is a functional device for those on a very tight budget.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Lava Blaze Duo handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Mediatek Dimensity 7025 chipset in the Lava Blaze Duo is significantly more capable of handling demanding games like PUBG Mobile compared to the Unisoc T610 in the Micromax In 2b. While you may need to adjust graphics settings for optimal performance, the Blaze Duo should provide a much smoother and more enjoyable gaming experience.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Micromax In 2b with its 10W charging?
With its 10W charging, the Micromax In 2b will likely take over 3 hours to fully charge from 0% to 100%. This is a significant drawback compared to the Lava Blaze Duo’s 33W charging, which can significantly reduce charging times.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference in chipset performance is noticeable even for everyday tasks. The Lava Blaze Duo’s Dimensity 7025 will provide a smoother and more responsive experience when browsing the web, scrolling through social media feeds, and switching between apps. The Micromax In 2b’s Unisoc T610 may exhibit occasional lag or stuttering during these tasks.
❓ Does the Lava Blaze Duo support VoLTE and VoWiFi?
While not explicitly stated, Lava phones generally support VoLTE (Voice over LTE) and VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) for improved call quality and connectivity. It's recommended to check with your carrier to confirm compatibility in your region.
