The Lava Blaze Curve and Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Blaze Curve aims for affordability, while the Poco X6 Pro pushes the boundaries of performance within its price bracket. This comparison dissects their key differences, focusing on chipset capabilities, display quality, and battery life to determine which device delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra chipset, coupled with a brighter display and faster 67W charging, justifies the price premium. However, the Lava Blaze Curve remains a viable option for budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 05 | 2024, January 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 11 | Available. Released 2024, January 12 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dragontrail Star 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) | 160.5 x 74.3 x 8.3 mm (6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 186 g or 190 g (6.56 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Dragontrail Star 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, 500 nits (typ), 1200 nits (HBM), 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8300 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali G615-MC6 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 14, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | - |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, QZSS, BDS (B1I+B1c) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 30 min | 67W wired, QC2.0, PD3.0, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iron Glass, Viridian Glass | Black, Yellow, Gray |
| Models | - | 2311DRK48G, 2311DRK48I |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 195.30 / $ 209.79 / £ 274.99 / ₹ 21,999 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Lava Blaze Curve
- More affordable price point
- Potentially lighter and more compact design (speculation)
- Adequate performance for basic tasks
- Significantly weaker chipset
- Likely inferior camera performance
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro
- Much faster and more powerful Dimensity 8300 Ultra
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster 67W charging
- Higher price tag
- Potentially larger and heavier design
- May require more frequent charging with heavy use
Display Comparison
The Poco X6 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1148 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Lava Blaze Curve, whose brightness remains unspecified. While the Blaze Curve's panel technology isn't detailed, the X6 Pro's high brightness suggests a more advanced LCD or AMOLED panel. The lack of refresh rate information for the Blaze Curve also puts it at a disadvantage against potentially higher refresh rate options on the X6 Pro, contributing to a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications for the Lava Blaze Curve are absent, making a direct comparison challenging. However, given its price point, it likely features a more basic camera setup. The Poco X6 Pro, while details are limited to 'Photo / Video', benefits from the processing power of the Dimensity 8300 Ultra, enabling better image processing and potentially superior low-light performance. The absence of information regarding sensor size and OIS on the Blaze Curve suggests it will struggle to match the X6 Pro's image quality in challenging conditions. We can assume the X6 Pro will offer more versatile shooting modes and better video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Mediatek Dimensity 7050 in the Lava Blaze Curve versus the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro. The 8300 Ultra, built on a more efficient 4nm process compared to the 7050’s 6nm, offers a substantial performance leap. The CPU configuration further highlights this – the X6 Pro features a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 core alongside 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 cores and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 cores, while the Blaze Curve has 2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This translates to faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly improved gaming performance on the Poco X6 Pro. The X6 Pro's GPU will also handle graphically intensive games with higher frame rates and detail settings.
Battery Life
The Poco X6 Pro demonstrates a clear advantage in battery endurance, achieving an active use score of 11:46h. While the Lava Blaze Curve’s battery capacity is not specified, the Poco X6 Pro’s score indicates efficient power management alongside its larger battery. Furthermore, the X6 Pro’s 67W wired charging with QC2.0 and PD3.0 support allows for a full charge in 45 minutes, significantly faster than the Blaze Curve’s 33W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 50%. This faster charging is crucial for users who need to quickly top up their battery throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Blaze Curve if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and prioritize a lower price point above all else. You'll appreciate its simplicity and adequate performance for light use. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X6 Pro if you're a gamer, a power user, or someone who values a vibrant display and rapid charging. The Dimensity 8300 Ultra provides a substantial performance boost, making it ideal for demanding applications and extended gaming sessions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8300 Ultra is built on a 4nm process, which inherently offers better thermal efficiency than the 6nm Dimensity 7050 in the Lava Blaze Curve. While some heat generation is inevitable during intense gaming, the X6 Pro is expected to manage temperatures more effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance for longer periods. However, sustained peak performance will still generate heat, and using a cooling accessory may further improve the experience.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Lava Blaze Curve slow compared to the Poco X6 Pro's 67W?
Yes, the 33W charging on the Lava Blaze Curve is considerably slower. While it can reach 50% charge in 30 minutes, the Poco X6 Pro can fully charge in 45 minutes. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery, making the X6 Pro a more convenient option.
❓ How much of a performance difference will I notice between the Dimensity 7050 and the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in everyday tasks?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference might not be immediately noticeable. However, when opening multiple apps, editing photos/videos, or playing demanding games, the Dimensity 8300 Ultra in the Poco X6 Pro will provide a much smoother and more responsive experience due to its superior CPU and GPU performance.
