The Lava Blaze Curve and Motorola Edge 50 Fusion represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Blaze Curve aims to deliver strong performance with the Mediatek Dimensity 7050, while the Edge 50 Fusion leverages Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 7s Gen 2, alongside a notably brighter display and faster charging. This comparison dives deep into the specifics to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and charging speed, the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion is the stronger choice. Its 1322-nit display and 68W charging significantly outperform the Lava Blaze Curve. However, the Blaze Curve offers a competitive chipset and could appeal to those seeking a balance of performance and affordability.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 71 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, March 05 | 2024, April 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, March 11 | Available. Released 2024, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Dragontrail Star 2), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3) | Glass front, silicone polymer back (eco leather), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.8 x 74 x 8.8 mm (6.37 x 2.91 x 0.35 in) | 161.9 x 73.1 x 7.9 mm (6.37 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 189 g (6.67 oz) | 174.9 g (6.17 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Dragontrail Star 2 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~91.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz (LATAM), 144Hz (INT), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.40 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.95 GHz Cortex-A55) - InternationalOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) - LATAM |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4 nm) - InternationalQualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) - LATAM |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 710 |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14 | Android 14, upgradable to Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.14", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 50% in 30 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iron Glass, Viridian Glass | Forest Blue, Marshmallow Blue, Hot Pink |
| Models | - | XT2429-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 208.99 / $ 245.00 / ₹ 18,667 |
Lava Blaze Curve
- Competitive chipset for the price
- Potentially more affordable
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Slower charging speed
- Likely lower display brightness
- Limited information on camera capabilities
Motorola Edge 50 Fusion
- Significantly brighter display (1322 nits)
- Much faster 68W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 chipset (International version)
- Potentially higher price
- LATAM version uses a less powerful Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
- Battery capacity not explicitly stated
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1322 nits, making it far more usable outdoors in direct sunlight. While the Lava Blaze Curve’s display specifications are not provided, it’s unlikely to match this peak brightness. The Edge 50 Fusion’s panel likely benefits from its higher price point, potentially offering better color accuracy and viewing angles. The lack of information on the Blaze Curve’s panel type (LCD vs AMOLED) and refresh rate leaves a significant gap in the comparison.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for either device, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Edge 50 Fusion likely features a more sophisticated camera system. Motorola generally focuses on computational photography, potentially delivering better image processing. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS on the Blaze Curve makes it difficult to assess its camera capabilities. It’s reasonable to assume the Edge 50 Fusion will offer a more versatile and higher-quality camera experience.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion, in its international variant, utilizes the Qualcomm SM7435-AB Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 (4nm), a more efficient chipset than the Lava Blaze Curve’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 translates to better thermal efficiency and potentially longer sustained performance under load. The CPU configurations are similar, both featuring Cortex-A78 cores, but the Edge 50 Fusion’s international version has slightly higher clock speeds (2.40 GHz vs 2.6 GHz on the Blaze Curve). However, the LATAM version of the Edge 50 Fusion uses the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, which would significantly reduce its performance advantage. The Blaze Curve’s Dimensity 7050 is still a capable performer, but the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 offers a more modern architecture and improved efficiency.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 50 Fusion excels in charging speed with its 68W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Lava Blaze Curve’s 33W charging is considerably slower, taking 30 minutes to reach the same 50% level. While the Edge 50 Fusion’s battery capacity isn’t specified, its active use score of 12:40h suggests good battery life. The Blaze Curve’s battery capacity is also unknown, but the slower charging speed implies it may not compensate for a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Blaze Curve if you need a solid all-around performer with a capable chipset for everyday tasks and light gaming, and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. Buy the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion if you prioritize a vibrant, bright display for media consumption, exceptionally fast charging, and a more refined user experience, even if it means a slightly higher price point.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 in the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 7s Gen 2's 4nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, it's less prone to throttling compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7050 in the Lava Blaze Curve, offering more sustained performance.
❓ Is the difference between the international and LATAM versions of the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion significant?
Yes, the LATAM version utilizes the Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, a considerably less powerful chipset than the Snapdragon 7s Gen 2 found in the international version. This difference will be noticeable in performance, especially during demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. Buyers in LATAM should be aware of this distinction.
❓ How does the 33W charging on the Lava Blaze Curve compare to other phones in its price range?
33W charging is relatively standard for phones in the sub-$300 price bracket, but it's significantly slower than the 68W charging offered by the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion. Expect longer charging times with the Blaze Curve, potentially requiring over an hour to fully charge the battery.
❓ What type of display does the Lava Blaze Curve use, and what is its refresh rate?
Unfortunately, the display type (LCD or AMOLED) and refresh rate of the Lava Blaze Curve are not currently specified. This lack of information makes it difficult to assess its display quality compared to the Motorola Edge 50 Fusion.
