The Lava Blaze series aims to deliver affordable smartphones with decent features. But with two models – the Blaze 5G and the Blaze 2 – choosing the right one can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Lava Blaze 5G takes the lead thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset and 5G connectivity. While the Blaze 2 offers faster charging, the Blaze 5G's performance advantage makes it the better choice for most users seeking a smoother experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 3 | 2023, April 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 24 | Available. Released 2023, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.4 x 8.9 mm (6.51 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165 x 76.1 x 8.6 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
0.3 MP | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green, Blue | Glass Blue, Glass Black, Glass Orange |
| Models | LXX503 | LZX409 |
| Price | About 130 EUR | About 100 EUR |
Lava Blaze 5G
- Significantly faster performance
- 5G connectivity
- Likely better image processing
- Modern chipset
- Slower charging (10W)
- Potentially similar display to Blaze 2
- May lack some features of higher-end phones
Lava Blaze 2
- Faster charging (18W)
- More affordable
- Adequate performance for basic tasks
- Weaker processor
- No 5G connectivity
- Potentially lower image quality
- Older chipset
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar display technology (likely IPS LCD) and resolution (likely FHD+). However, the Blaze 5G might have a slightly larger display or a higher refresh rate, though this is not explicitly stated in the provided specs. We'll assume a standard 60Hz refresh rate for both.
Camera Comparison
While specs don't detail camera resolution, both phones likely feature a multi-camera setup (likely a primary sensor, ultrawide, and macro). The Blaze 5G's more powerful processor *could* lead to slightly better image processing and overall camera performance, but this is speculative without detailed camera specifications.
Performance
This is where the Blaze 5G shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 700 is a considerably more powerful chipset than the Unisoc Tiger T616. Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Blaze 5G. The Blaze 2 will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Blaze 2 has a clear advantage here with 18W charging compared to the Blaze 5G's 10W. This means the Blaze 2 will charge significantly faster. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh for both), so real-world battery life should be comparable, but the Blaze 2 will recover faster.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze 5G is ideal for users who prioritize performance, 5G connectivity, and a smoother overall experience. The Lava Blaze 2 is a good option for those on a tighter budget who primarily need a phone for basic tasks and appreciate faster charging.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Lava Blaze 5G worth the extra cost?
Yes, if performance and 5G connectivity are important to you. The Dimensity 700 chipset offers a substantial upgrade over the T616.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both likely have similar battery capacity, but the Blaze 2 charges faster, which can be a significant advantage.
❓ Can the Lava Blaze 2 handle gaming?
It can handle basic games, but don't expect smooth performance in demanding titles. The Blaze 5G is a better choice for gamers.
