The Lava Blaze series aims to deliver affordable smartphones with decent features. But with two models – the Blaze 2 and Blaze Pro – choosing the right one can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Lava Blaze 2 edges out the Blaze Pro thanks to its significantly faster chipset and quicker charging. While both offer budget-friendly appeal, the Blaze 2's improved performance makes it the better choice for most users seeking a smoother experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 10 | 2022, September 20 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 18 | Available. Released 2022, September 20 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.1 x 8.6 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 164.8 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.49 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | - | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, (wide), 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
VGA |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 10W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glass Blue, Glass Black, Glass Orange | Gold, Green, Blue, Orange |
| Models | LZX409 | LZX404 |
| Price | About 100 EUR | About 130 EUR |
Lava Blaze 2
- Faster Processor (Unisoc T616)
- Faster 18W Charging
- Potentially better image processing
- More responsive UI
- Potentially slightly smaller battery
- May be slightly more expensive
Lava Blaze Pro
- Potentially longer battery life
- Likely more affordable
- Decent camera for the price
- Slower Processor (Helio G37)
- Slow 10W Charging
- Less responsive UI
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar displays – probably a 6.5-inch HD+ IPS LCD. Expect decent color accuracy and viewing angles, but don't anticipate flagship-level brightness or resolution. The Blaze 2 might have slightly better color calibration due to potentially more refined software.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup, with a primary sensor around 50MP. Image quality will be adequate in good lighting conditions, but expect noise and limited detail in low light. The Blaze 2's more powerful processor *could* lead to slightly better image processing and potentially better video recording capabilities.
Performance
This is where the Blaze 2 shines. The Unisoc Tiger T616 offers a noticeable performance boost over the Helio G37 in the Blaze Pro. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a more responsive user interface on the Blaze 2. Gaming performance will also be better on the Blaze 2.
Battery Life
The Blaze Pro likely has a slightly larger battery capacity (potentially 5000mAh or slightly higher) compared to the Blaze 2 (likely around 4500mAh). However, the Blaze 2's 18W charging significantly offsets this, allowing for much faster charging times than the Blaze Pro's 10W charging.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze 2 is ideal for users prioritizing performance and faster charging, even on a budget. The Blaze Pro might suit those primarily focused on basic usage and extended battery life, potentially at a slightly lower price point (if available).
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which Lava phone is better for gaming?
The Lava Blaze 2 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset.
❓ How long does the battery last on each phone?
The Blaze Pro likely has a slightly larger battery, but the Blaze 2's faster charging means it will reach full charge quicker. Expect a full day of moderate use on both.
❓ Are the cameras on these phones any good?
Both cameras are decent for the price, but don't expect flagship-level performance. Good lighting is key for capturing quality photos.
