The Lava Blaze series has quickly become a contender in the budget smartphone market. The Blaze 2 and Blaze 1X offer compelling features at affordable prices, but which one truly delivers the best experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Lava Blaze 1X takes the crown thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset. While the Blaze 2 offers slightly faster charging, the 1X's superior performance in gaming and everyday tasks makes it the better overall choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 10 | 2023, April 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 18 | Available. Released 2023, June 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165 x 76.1 x 8.6 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) | 165.3 x 76.4 x 8.9 mm (6.51 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 203 g (7.16 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP
0.3 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 15W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glass Blue, Glass Black, Glass Orange | Glass Blue, Glass Green |
| Models | LZX409 | - |
| Price | About 100 EUR | - |
Lava Blaze 2
- Slightly faster charging (18W)
- Weaker chipset (Unisoc T616)
- Potentially slower performance
- Likely similar camera quality to 1X but with less processing power
Lava Blaze 1X
- Significantly more powerful chipset (Dimensity 700)
- Better performance for gaming and multitasking
- Potentially better camera image processing
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar LCD displays, probably around 6.5 inches with an HD+ resolution. The Blaze 1X *might* have slightly better color accuracy due to the more powerful chipset allowing for better display processing, but this is speculative without specific display panel details. Expect similar viewing angles and brightness levels.
Camera Comparison
Camera specs are likely similar, potentially featuring a 50MP main sensor and a few supporting lenses. However, the Blaze 1X's more powerful processor will likely result in better image processing, improved low-light performance, and potentially better video recording capabilities. Expect slightly more detailed and vibrant photos from the 1X.
Performance
This is where the Blaze 1X shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Unisoc Tiger T616 (12nm). Expect significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a much better gaming experience on the Blaze 1X. The Blaze 2 will feel noticeably slower, especially with demanding apps.
Battery Life
Both phones likely have a battery capacity around 5000mAh. The Blaze 2 has 18W charging, while the Blaze 1X has 15W. This means the Blaze 2 will charge slightly faster, but the difference isn't massive. Battery life itself should be comparable between the two, lasting a full day with moderate usage.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze 2 is a good option for users prioritizing slightly faster charging and potentially a more refined design (assuming similar build quality, which isn't explicitly stated). The Lava Blaze 1X is ideal for those seeking a smoother, faster experience, especially for gaming and multitasking, and are willing to trade a bit of charging speed.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Lava Blaze 2 worth buying if I only use my phone for basic tasks?
If you primarily use your phone for calls, texts, and light browsing, the Blaze 2 might suffice. However, the Blaze 1X still offers better future-proofing and a smoother experience even for basic tasks.
❓ Can the Lava Blaze 1X handle demanding games?
Yes, the Dimensity 700 chipset in the Blaze 1X is capable of handling most popular mobile games at decent settings. The Blaze 2 would struggle with more demanding titles.
