The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Lava Blaze 1X and Samsung Galaxy A05s represent compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The Blaze 1X focuses on delivering a more powerful processor for the price, while the A05s emphasizes battery endurance and Samsung’s established brand recognition. This comparison dives deep into the specs to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and occasional gaming, the Lava Blaze 1X is the better choice thanks to its Mediatek Dimensity 700 chipset. However, the Samsung Galaxy A05s wins for all-day battery life and a brighter, more visible display, making it ideal for media consumption and less demanding users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 27 | 2023, September 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 14 | Available. Released 2023, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.4 x 8.9 mm (6.51 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 168 x 77.8 x 8.8 mm (6.61 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP
0.3 MP | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glass Blue, Glass Green | Black, Silver, Light Green, Violet |
| Models | - | SM-A057F, SM-A057F/DS, SM-A057M, SM-A057M/DS, SM-A057G/DSN, SM-A057G |
| Price | - | $ 134.00 / C$ 146.99 / £ 83.94 / € 100.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.31 W/kg (body) |
Lava Blaze 1X
- More powerful processor for smoother performance
- Potentially better gaming experience
- Faster chipset fabrication process (7nm)
- Battery life likely shorter than the A05s
- Charging speed is slower (15W)
- Display brightness and quality are unknown
Samsung Galaxy A05s
- Excellent battery life (11:32h active use)
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Faster charging (25W)
- Less powerful processor for demanding tasks
- May struggle with heavy multitasking
- Potentially less responsive gaming experience
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A05s boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 468 nits, compared to an unstated value for the Lava Blaze 1X. This brightness advantage translates to better visibility under direct sunlight. Furthermore, the A05s’ 1418:1 contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. While the Blaze 1X’s display specs are unknown, it’s likely to be a lower-brightness panel, potentially impacting outdoor usability. The lack of information on the Blaze 1X’s panel type (IPS, AMOLED) makes a direct comparison difficult, but the A05s’ measured specs give it a clear edge for visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature basic camera setups, and detailed camera performance data is limited. The Galaxy A05s’ camera is described as capable of Photo/Video, but lacks specifics on sensor size or aperture. It’s reasonable to assume a primary sensor around 13MP, typical for this price range. The Lava Blaze 1X’s camera specs are also unavailable. Given the market segment, both phones likely rely heavily on software processing to enhance image quality. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to declare a clear winner, but the A05s benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms.
Performance
The Lava Blaze 1X’s Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7nm) chipset offers a performance advantage over the Samsung Galaxy A05s’ Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm). The Dimensity 700 utilizes Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz, providing a noticeable boost in single-core performance compared to the Snapdragon 680’s 2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold cores. While the Snapdragon 680 has more cores (octa-core vs octa-core), the architectural differences favor the Dimensity 700 in demanding tasks. The 7nm process node of the Dimensity 700 also suggests slightly better power efficiency under load. This translates to smoother app launches, faster multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Blaze 1X.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A05s shines in battery life, achieving an impressive 11 hours and 32 minutes of active use. While the Lava Blaze 1X’s battery capacity is unknown, the A05s’ endurance is a significant advantage. The A05s also supports 25W wired charging, allowing for faster top-ups compared to the Blaze 1X’s 15W charging. This faster charging speed minimizes downtime and ensures the phone is ready to go when you need it. The combination of long battery life and faster charging makes the A05s the clear winner in this category.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Blaze 1X if you need a phone capable of handling moderate gaming and multitasking without significant slowdowns, and you don't mind potentially shorter battery life. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A05s if you prioritize all-day battery life, a brighter screen for outdoor visibility, and the peace of mind that comes with the Samsung ecosystem, even if it means sacrificing some processing power.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Snapdragon 680 in the Galaxy A05s sufficient for playing games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 680 can run PUBG Mobile, but likely at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a stable experience. It's not designed for demanding gaming, and you may encounter occasional stuttering. The Lava Blaze 1X with its Dimensity 700 will provide a smoother gaming experience overall.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the Samsung Galaxy A05s with the 25W charger?
While Samsung doesn't officially state the 0-100% charging time, with a 25W charger, you can expect a full charge in approximately 1 hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours, depending on usage during charging. This is significantly faster than the Lava Blaze 1X's 15W charging.
❓ Does the Lava Blaze 1X support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Given Lava's focus on the Indian market, the Blaze 1X likely supports VoLTE (Voice over LTE) for improved call quality on 4G networks. VoWiFi (Voice over Wi-Fi) support is less certain and would depend on carrier compatibility. Check with your mobile carrier for specific VoWiFi support.
