The Lava Blaze series aims to deliver affordable smartphones with decent features. But with two iterations, the Blaze 1X and Blaze 2, choosing the right one can be tricky. This comprehensive comparison will dissect their specs, performance, and overall value to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Lava Blaze 1X takes the lead thanks to its significantly more powerful Dimensity 700 chipset. While the Blaze 2 offers slightly faster charging, the 1X's superior performance makes it the better choice for most users seeking a smooth and responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 | GSM 900 / 1800 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, April 27 | 2023, April 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, June 14 | Available. Released 2023, April 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 76.4 x 8.9 mm (6.51 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 165 x 76.1 x 8.6 mm (6.50 x 3.00 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 207 g (7.30 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~270 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~80.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~81.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| OS | Android 12 | Android 12 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 13 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Triple | 50 MP, (wide), AF
2 MP
0.3 MP | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, (wide) | 8 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Glass Blue, Glass Green | Glass Blue, Glass Black, Glass Orange |
| Models | - | LZX409 |
| Price | - | About 100 EUR |
Lava Blaze 1X
- Superior Performance (Dimensity 700)
- Better Gaming Experience
- Potentially better camera processing
- Good Battery Life
- Slower Charging (15W)
- May lack some software optimizations
Lava Blaze 2
- Slightly Faster Charging (18W)
- Potentially minor display improvements
- Competitive Price
- Weaker Performance (Unisoc T616)
- Less Smooth Multitasking
- Lower Gaming Performance
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar displays – probably around 6.5-inch HD+ LCD panels. Expect decent viewing angles and brightness for everyday use, but don't anticipate flagship-level color accuracy or sharpness. The Blaze 2 might have a slightly improved panel based on minor revisions, but the difference will be minimal.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature a triple-camera setup with a primary sensor around 50MP. Image quality will be comparable in good lighting conditions. However, the Dimensity 700's image signal processor (ISP) in the Blaze 1X might offer slightly better image processing and low-light performance. Expect decent but not exceptional camera capabilities from both.
Performance
This is where the Blaze 1X shines. The Mediatek Dimensity 700 is a substantial upgrade over the Unisoc Tiger T616. Expect noticeably faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance on the Blaze 1X. The T616 is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely pack a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate usage. The Blaze 2's 18W charging is marginally faster than the Blaze 1X's 15W, but the difference isn't significant. Charging time will still be around 2-3 hours for a full charge.
Buying Guide
The Lava Blaze 1X is ideal for users prioritizing performance and smooth multitasking, even with basic gaming. The Lava Blaze 2 is a good option for those who value slightly faster charging and are less concerned about raw processing power, perhaps focusing more on basic usage and media consumption.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Lava Blaze 1X worth the extra money?
Yes, if performance is a priority. The Dimensity 700 offers a significant upgrade over the T616, making the Blaze 1X a more enjoyable device for most users.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
Both phones offer similar battery life, likely lasting a full day with moderate usage. The Blaze 2 charges slightly faster, but the difference is minimal.
