The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Lava Agni 2 and the Xiaomi Poco F5. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a comprehensive comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the stronger contender, boasting a superior Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, a brighter display, and impressive battery life. While the Lava Agni 2 offers fast charging, the Poco F5's overall performance and features make it the more well-rounded choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 16 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.7 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF
8 MP, (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 16 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Blue, Purple, Gray | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | - | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Lava Agni 2
- Fast 66W Charging
- Potentially more affordable
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Less powerful chipset
- Likely inferior display
- Uncertain camera quality
- Battery life likely not as good
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Superior Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset
- Bright and vibrant display (963 nits)
- Excellent battery life (118h endurance)
- Fast 67W Charging
- Slightly higher price
- Camera details need further review
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes a clear lead with its 963 nits max brightness, offering significantly better visibility in outdoor conditions. Its infinite contrast ratio promises deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The Agni 2's display is likely adequate, but lacks the Poco F5's punch. We expect the Poco F5 to have an AMOLED display, while the Agni 2 likely uses an IPS LCD.
Camera Comparison
While both phones offer 'Photo / Video' capabilities, the Poco F5 is expected to have a more advanced camera system. The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 often pairs with better image processing capabilities. We anticipate the Poco F5 will offer better dynamic range, detail, and low-light performance. Specific camera specs (megapixels, sensors) would be needed for a more precise comparison.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is a significant upgrade over the Dimensity 7050. The Cortex-X2 core and improved architecture provide noticeably faster processing speeds and smoother multitasking. Gaming performance will also be superior on the Poco F5. The Agni 2 is still capable, but falls short in raw power.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 shines with its exceptional battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 118 hours. Its active use score of 11:52h is also impressive. The Agni 2's battery performance is likely decent, but not in the same league as the Poco F5. The Poco F5's 67W charging is also competitive with the Agni 2's 66W.
Buying Guide
The Lava Agni 2 is a good option for users prioritizing fast charging and a slightly more budget-friendly price. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is ideal for those seeking top-tier performance, a vibrant display, and long-lasting battery life, even if it means spending a bit more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset.
❓ Does the Lava Agni 2 have a good camera?
While the Lava Agni 2 has a camera, the Poco F5 is expected to offer better image quality and features based on the chipset and typical camera setups for these devices.
