Lava Agni 2 vs OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite edges out the Lava Agni 2 thanks to its slightly faster charging and generally smoother software experience. While the Agni 2 boasts a more powerful chipset, the Nord CE 3 Lite's optimizations and brand recognition give it a slight advantage for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Lava Agni 2 | OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 16 | 2023, April 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, April 11 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.7 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 165.5 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.52 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 195 g (6.88 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~391 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.72 inches, 109.6 cm2 (~87.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (HBM) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ), 680 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, OxygenOS 13.1 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.67", 0.64µm, PDAF 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GALILEO, GLONASS, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 16 min | 67W wired, 80% in 30 min |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Purple, Gray | Pastel Lime, Chromatic Gray |
| Models | - | CPH2467, CPH2465 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | £ 169.98 / € 209.99 |
| SAR | - | 1.17 W/kg (head) 0.70 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 412006 (v9) GeekBench: 2052 (v5) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Lava Agni 2
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 7050)
- Competitive price
- Decent camera hardware
- Software optimization may be lacking
- Charging speed slightly slower
- Brand recognition less established
OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite
- Faster charging (67W)
- Polished OxygenOS software
- Strong brand reputation
- Good camera performance
- Chipset slightly less powerful
- Design may be less exciting
- Potential for bloatware
Display Comparison
Both phones feature similar 6.79-inch FHD+ displays, likely with LCD panels. Expect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles, though neither will match the quality of OLED screens found in higher-end devices. The Nord CE 3 Lite might have slightly better color calibration due to OnePlus's reputation for display tuning.
Camera Comparison
The Nord CE 3 Lite likely features a 108MP main camera, offering good detail in well-lit conditions. The Agni 2 is expected to have a 50MP main camera. Image processing and software features will be key differentiators. OnePlus generally has a slight edge in camera software and image quality.
Performance
The Lava Agni 2's Mediatek Dimensity 7050 holds a theoretical performance advantage over the Nord CE 3 Lite's Snapdragon 695 5G. However, real-world performance depends on software optimization. Expect smoother multitasking and slightly faster app loading times on the Agni 2, but the Nord CE 3 Lite's OxygenOS is known for its efficiency.
Battery Life
Both phones pack large 5000mAh batteries. The Nord CE 3 Lite's 67W charging is noticeably faster than the Agni 2's 66W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Lava Agni 2 is ideal for users prioritizing raw processing power for gaming or demanding apps. The OnePlus Nord CE 3 Lite is a better choice for those seeking a reliable, well-supported device with fast charging and a polished user interface.