Lava Agni 2 vs Google Pixel 7a: A Detailed Comparison of Mid-Range Powerhouses
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality, software experience, and long-term support, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. However, the Lava Agni 2 offers a significant performance advantage for gaming and demanding tasks, coupled with incredibly fast 66W charging, making it ideal for power users on a budget.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Lava Agni 2 | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 16 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 24 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.2 x 74.7 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 2.94 x 0.35 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 950 nits (HBM) | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, (ultrawide) 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1.0µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 66W wired, 50% in 16 min | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | Li-Po 4700 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Blue, Purple, Gray | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | - | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | About 220 EUR | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Lava Agni 2
- Significantly faster 66W charging
- Potentially stronger raw CPU performance for multitasking
- More affordable price point
- Likely inferior camera quality compared to Pixel 7a
- Less refined software experience and update support
Google Pixel 7a
- Superior camera quality and image processing
- AI-powered features and Google’s software ecosystem
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Slower 18W charging
- Higher price compared to Lava Agni 2
Display Comparison
The Google Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Lava Agni 2’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower, potentially impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel, combined with its brightness, offers a more vibrant and visually appealing experience. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means refresh rates are likely fixed, impacting battery efficiency during dynamic content viewing.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system is a key strength, leveraging Google’s computational photography expertise. While specific sensor details are not provided, the Pixel 7a’s image processing is renowned for its dynamic range and accurate colors. The Lava Agni 2’s camera specifications are not detailed enough to make a direct comparison, but it’s unlikely to match the Pixel 7a’s image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Pixel 7a’s video capabilities are also expected to be superior, benefiting from the Tensor G2’s processing power and advanced stabilization features. We can assume the Pixel 7a will have superior software features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 (5nm) utilizes a 2+2+4 core configuration with Cortex-X1 performance cores clocked at 2.85 GHz, designed for AI tasks and image processing. The Lava Agni 2’s Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6nm) features a 2+6 core setup with Cortex-A78 cores at 2.6 GHz. The 5nm process of the Tensor G2 generally translates to better power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7050, though the Agni 2’s architecture may offer competitive raw CPU performance. The Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2 excels in machine learning tasks, enhancing camera features and voice recognition. The Agni 2, however, may show an edge in sustained gaming performance due to potentially better thermal headroom.
Battery Life
The Google Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, suggesting solid battery life. However, its 18W wired charging is significantly slower than the Lava Agni 2’s 66W charging, which claims a 50% charge in just 16 minutes. This difference is substantial; the Agni 2 is ideal for users who need to quickly top up their battery. While the Pixel 7a offers 7.5W wireless charging, the Agni 2 lacks this feature. The Pixel 7a’s efficiency from the Tensor G2 chip may offset the slower charging speed for some users, but the Agni 2’s charging speed is a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Lava Agni 2 if you need a phone primarily for gaming, multitasking, or frequently transfer large files, and value extremely fast charging. Its Dimensity 7050 chipset delivers strong performance. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you prioritize camera quality, a clean and intuitive software experience with guaranteed updates, and AI-powered features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur. It’s the better all-rounder for everyday use.