Karbonn Smart Tab 10 vs Micromax Funbook Pro: Which Budget Tablet Reigns Supreme?

The Karbonn Smart Tab 10 and Micromax Funbook Pro represent the lower end of the Android tablet market, targeting users seeking basic functionality at an extremely affordable price. However, even within this segment, significant differences in processing power can impact the user experience. This comparison dissects the core hardware to determine which tablet delivers the best value.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For users needing more than just basic web browsing and video playback, the Karbonn Smart Tab 10 is the superior choice. Its Mediatek MT6737 chipset, featuring a dual-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A9 CPU, provides a noticeable performance advantage over the Micromax Funbook Pro’s older 1.2 GHz Cortex-A8 processor.

PHONES
Phone Names Karbonn Smart Tab 10 Micromax Funbook Pro
Network
2G bandsN/AN/A
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 -
4G bands3, 5, 40-
EDGENoNo
GPRSNoNo
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps-
TechnologyNo cellular connectivityNo cellular connectivity
Launch
Announced2012. Released 20122012, August. Released 2012, August
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions--
SIMNoNo
Weight--
Display
Resolution1024 x 768 pixels, 4:3 ratio (~132 ppi density)600 x 1024 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~118 ppi density)
Size9.7 inches, 291.4 cm210.1 inches, 287.1 cm2
TypeTFTTFT
Platform
CPUDual-core 1.5 GHz Cortex-A91.2 GHz Cortex-A8
ChipsetMediatek MT6737 (28 nm)-
GPUMali-400Mali-400
OSAndroid 4.1.1 (Jelly Bean)Android 4.0.3 (Ice Cream Sandwich)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDHC (dedicated slot)microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal1.5GB 1GB RAM8GB 1GB RAM
Main Camera
FeaturesDual-LED dual-tone flash, panorama-
Single2 MPVGA
VideoYes-
Selfie camera
FeaturesLED flash-
SingleYes-
 -No
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
BluetoothYesNo
NFCNo-
PositioningNoNo
RadioNoNo
USBProprietaryProprietary
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/nWi-Fi 802.11 b/g
Features
SensorsAccelerometerAccelerometer
 HDMI portHDMI port MP3/WAV/WMA/AAC/Flac player DivX/XviD/MP4/WMV/H.264 player Organizer Photo editor Document viewer/editor Voice memo/dial Predictive text input
Battery
Music playUp to 15 h-
Talk timeUp to 7 h (3G)Up to 6 h (multimedia)
TypeLi-Ion 6000 mAh, non-removableNon-removable Li-Ion 5600 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsBlack/WhiteSilver, Black
ModelsC1-
PriceAbout 140 EURAbout 170 EUR

Karbonn Smart Tab 10

  • More powerful Mediatek MT6737 chipset
  • Improved CPU architecture (Cortex-A9)
  • Potentially better battery life due to chipset efficiency

  • Display quality likely basic
  • Camera performance likely poor

Micromax Funbook Pro

  • Likely the most affordable option
  • Suitable for very basic tasks
  • Simple and easy to use

  • Outdated Cortex-A8 processor
  • Significantly slower performance
  • Limited multitasking capabilities

Display Comparison

Neither device boasts a standout display. Given the price point, both likely utilize TN panels with limited viewing angles and color accuracy. Specifics like resolution and screen size are unavailable, but the focus here is on performance, not visual fidelity. The absence of information prevents a detailed comparison of brightness or color gamut.

Camera Comparison

Camera performance is likely to be poor on both devices, and detailed specifications are unavailable. Given the target market, both tablets likely feature low-resolution sensors. Without specific megapixel counts or aperture information, a meaningful comparison is impossible. It’s safe to assume neither tablet is suitable for serious photography.

Performance

The core difference lies in the processors. The Karbonn Smart Tab 10’s Mediatek MT6737, built on a 28nm process, represents a significant architectural leap over the Micromax Funbook Pro’s 1.2 GHz Cortex-A8. The Cortex-A9 in the MT6737 offers improved instructions per clock cycle (IPC) and a more efficient architecture, translating to faster app loading times and smoother overall responsiveness. While both are dual-core CPUs, the A9’s design is more capable. The 28nm manufacturing process of the MT6737 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained use. Users will experience a tangible difference in performance when navigating the UI or running multiple applications.

Battery Life

Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, the more efficient Mediatek MT6737 in the Karbonn Smart Tab 10 will likely result in longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity to the Micromax Funbook Pro. The 28nm process node contributes to lower power consumption, extending usage time between charges. Charging wattage is also unknown, making it difficult to estimate 0-100% charge times.

Buying Guide

Buy the Karbonn Smart Tab 10 if you anticipate multitasking, running slightly more demanding apps, or require smoother performance for streaming video. Its more modern chipset will handle these tasks with greater ease. Buy the Micromax Funbook Pro if your needs are extremely basic – primarily reading ebooks, light web browsing, and simple document editing – and you prioritize the absolute lowest possible price point.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Karbonn Smart Tab 10 handle basic games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds?
Yes, the Mediatek MT6737 chipset should be capable of running less demanding games like Candy Crush or Angry Birds without significant issues. However, don't expect a smooth experience with graphically intensive 3D titles.
❓ Is the Micromax Funbook Pro suitable for video conferencing?
The Micromax Funbook Pro's older Cortex-A8 processor may struggle with the demands of video conferencing, potentially leading to lag or dropped frames. The Karbonn Smart Tab 10 would be a better choice for this purpose, though still not ideal.
❓ Can I expect to run multiple apps simultaneously on the Karbonn Smart Tab 10?
While the Karbonn Smart Tab 10 is superior to the Funbook Pro, its 2GB of RAM (assumed based on market segment) will limit multitasking. You can run a few apps concurrently, but excessive multitasking may lead to slowdowns.