Karbonn A1+ vs. Karbonn A12+: A Detailed Performance Comparison

The Karbonn A1+ and A12+ represent Karbonn's attempts to deliver affordable smartphones to the Indian market. While both devices target budget-conscious consumers, a key difference lies in their processing power. This comparison dissects the implications of the A12+'s dual-core 1.3 GHz CPU versus the A1+'s single-core 1.0 GHz processor, revealing which device offers a smoother user experience.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For most users, the Karbonn A12+ is the superior choice. The dual-core 1.3 GHz processor provides a noticeable performance boost over the A1+'s 1.0 GHz CPU, resulting in faster app loading times and improved multitasking capabilities. While both phones are entry-level, the A12+ offers a more responsive experience.

PHONES
Phone Names Karbonn A1+ Karbonn A12+
Network
2G bandsGSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2
3G bands-HSDPA 2100
EDGEYes-
GPRSYes-
Speed-HSPA
TechnologyGSMGSM / HSPA
Launch
Announced20122013, October. Released 2013, October
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
Dimensions114.5 x 60.6 x 13.8 mm (4.51 x 2.39 x 0.54 in)-
SIMDual SIM (Mini-SIM)Dual SIM
Weight130 g (4.59 oz)-
Display
Resolution320 x 480 pixels, 3:2 ratio (~165 ppi density)480 x 800 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~233 ppi density)
Size3.5 inches, 36.5 cm2 (~52.6% screen-to-body ratio)4.0 inches, 45.5 cm2
TypeTFT, 256K colorsIPS LCD
Platform
CPU1.0 GHzDual-core 1.3 GHz
OSAndroid 2.3.6 (Gingerbread)Android 4.2 (Jelly Bean)
Memory
Card slotmicroSDHC (dedicated slot)microSDHC (dedicated slot)
Internal256MB RAM4GB 512MB RAM
Main Camera
Features-LED flash
Single3 MP5 MP, AF
VideoYesYes
Selfie camera
SingleVGAVGA
Sound
3.5mm jack -Yes
35mm jackYes-
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth2.1, A2DPYes
NFCNoNo
PositioningNoGPS
RadioFM radioFM radio
USBmicroUSB 2.0microUSB 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 b/gWi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot
Features
SensorsAccelerometer, proximityAccelerometer, proximity
Battery
Stand-byUp to 240 h-
Talk timeUp to 4 h-
TypeLi-Ion 1500 mAh, removableLi-Ion 1400 mAh battery
Misc
ColorsIvory WhiteBlack/White
PriceAbout 50 EURAbout 60 EUR
SAR0.66 W/kg (head)-

Karbonn A1+

  • Lower price point (likely)
  • Simpler user experience for basic tasks
  • Potentially longer standby time due to less active processing

  • Significantly slower performance
  • Poor multitasking capabilities
  • Struggles with even moderately demanding apps

Karbonn A12+

  • Faster and more responsive performance
  • Improved multitasking capabilities
  • Better suited for running multiple apps

  • Slightly higher price (likely)
  • May have marginally shorter battery life under heavy use
  • Still limited by overall hardware capabilities

Display Comparison

Given the limited data, we can assume both devices feature similar low-resolution displays typical of their price segment. The A12+’s slightly faster processor *could* contribute to smoother scrolling and animations, but the display panel itself is unlikely to be a differentiating factor. Expect TN panels with limited viewing angles on both.

Camera Comparison

Without specific camera specifications, it's safe to assume both devices feature basic camera setups. Given the target market, expect low-resolution sensors and limited image quality. The A12+'s faster processor *might* aid in slightly faster image processing, but the overall camera experience will likely be similar on both devices. Any claims of advanced features should be viewed with skepticism.

Performance

The core difference between these devices is the CPU. The Karbonn A12+’s dual-core 1.3 GHz processor represents a significant upgrade over the A1+'s single-core 1.0 GHz unit. This isn't just about clock speed; the dual-core architecture allows for true multitasking, enabling the A12+ to handle background processes and app switching more efficiently. The A1+, constrained by its single core, will struggle with even moderate multitasking, leading to noticeable lag. While neither processor is powerful enough for demanding games, the A12+ will offer a more playable experience in less intensive titles.

Battery Life

Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, the A12+'s more efficient dual-core processor could potentially lead to slightly better battery life, even if both phones have similar battery sizes. The faster processor allows tasks to be completed quicker, reducing the overall time the CPU is active and consuming power. Charging speeds are also unknown, but likely slow on both devices.

Buying Guide

Buy the Karbonn A1+ if you primarily need a phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light web browsing – and prioritize absolute affordability. It's suitable for first-time smartphone users or as a secondary device. Buy the Karbonn A12+ if you anticipate using multiple apps simultaneously, enjoy occasional gaming, or simply prefer a more fluid and responsive user interface. The A12+ offers a better long-term experience for a minimal price increase.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Karbonn A12+ be able to run popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the dual-core 1.3 GHz processor in the A12+ should handle Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. While it won't offer a flagship-level experience, it will provide a usable and responsive experience for these essential apps. The A1+, with its single-core processor, may struggle with these apps, especially when multitasking.
❓ Is the dual-core processor in the A12+ sufficient for playing basic Android games?
The A12+ can handle some basic Android games, particularly those that are not graphically intensive. However, don't expect to play demanding titles like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile at high settings. The A1+ will likely struggle even with simpler games due to its limited processing power.
❓ Will I notice a difference in app loading times between the A1+ and A12+?
Yes, you will definitely notice a difference. The A12+'s dual-core processor will load apps significantly faster than the A1+'s single-core processor. This is because the A12+ can process more data simultaneously, reducing the time it takes to launch applications.