The itel Vision 2 and Oppo A15s represent two contenders in the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at an accessible price, they take different approaches to achieving this. The itel Vision 2 relies on a newer, though less powerful, Unisoc chipset, while the Oppo A15s opts for the more established MediaTek Helio P35. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic tasks and extended battery life, the Oppo A15s emerges as the slightly better choice. Its Helio P35 chipset, built on a more efficient 12nm process, provides a noticeable performance edge over the itel Vision 2’s Unisoc SC9863A, despite the clock speed differences, making it more responsive for everyday use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021 | 2020, December 18. Released 2020, December 18 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | - | 164 x 75.4 x 7.9 mm (6.46 x 2.97 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 177 g (6.24 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 480 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm) |
| GPU | IMG8322 | PowerVR GE8320 |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition) | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 13 MP, (wide)
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 13 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE, aptX |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB | microUSB 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 10W wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4230 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Green | Dynamic Black, Fancy White |
| Models | - | CPH2179 |
| Price | - | About 130 EUR |
itel Vision 2
- Potentially lower price point
- Unisoc chipset offers a newer architecture
- Likely large battery capacity (estimated)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Helio P35
- Larger fabrication process (28nm) leads to lower efficiency
- Likely slower charging speeds
Oppo A15s
- More powerful and efficient MediaTek Helio P35 chipset
- 10W wired charging for faster and more reliable charging
- Better optimized software and driver support
- May be slightly more expensive than the itel Vision 2
- Camera performance likely similar to itel Vision 2
- Still a budget device with inherent limitations
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. Both are likely to feature LCD panels, typical for this price bracket. However, the lack of detailed display specifications prevents a direct comparison of brightness or color accuracy. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both, maximizing screen real estate within their respective budgets. The absence of features like high refresh rates or HDR support is standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is likely to be similar, with both devices relying on basic sensors. Without specific sensor details, it’s safe to assume both will struggle in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on the Oppo A15s is a common, but often underwhelming, feature in this price range, offering limited practical benefit. Image processing will likely be heavily reliant on software algorithms to enhance image quality, and differences will likely be more noticeable in software tuning than in hardware capabilities. Expect acceptable results in well-lit environments, but don't anticipate flagship-level image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo A15s’ MediaTek Helio P35 (12nm) benefits from a smaller fabrication process compared to the itel Vision 2’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). This translates to improved power efficiency and, crucially, better sustained performance. While the itel Vision 2 has an octa-core CPU, the split between 1.6GHz and 1.2GHz Cortex-A55 cores suggests a focus on power saving rather than raw speed. The Oppo A15s’ CPU configuration of 4x2.35 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 cores offers a higher peak clock speed and a more capable architecture, resulting in snappier app launches and smoother multitasking. The Helio P35 also has a more mature driver support, potentially leading to better optimization.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device, but both are likely to house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for budget smartphones. The Oppo A15s’ 10W wired charging is a slight advantage over the likely 5W or non-standard charging solution on the itel Vision 2. While 10W isn’t fast by modern standards, it provides a more reliable and convenient charging experience, allowing for a full charge in a reasonable timeframe. The more efficient Helio P35 chipset in the Oppo A15s will also contribute to longer battery life during typical usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel Vision 2 if you need a phone primarily for very light tasks like calls, messaging, and occasional social media browsing, and are on an extremely tight budget. Its focus is on affordability above all else. Buy the Oppo A15s if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience for everyday apps, enjoy occasional gaming, and value the convenience of 10W charging, even if it's not particularly fast.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Oppo A15s be able to handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio P35 in the Oppo A15s can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a stable experience. The Unisoc SC9863A in the itel Vision 2 will likely struggle even at the lowest settings, making the Oppo A15s the better choice for casual gaming.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A53 vs Cortex-A55) significant in real-world use?
While both are ARM Cortex-A series cores, the Cortex-A55 is a newer generation with improved efficiency and performance per clock cycle. However, the larger difference lies in the fabrication process (12nm vs 28nm) and the higher clock speeds of the Helio P35, which have a more noticeable impact on overall responsiveness.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Oppo A15s compared to the itel Vision 2?
The Oppo A15s' 10W charging will be significantly faster than the likely 5W or non-standard charging on the itel Vision 2. While not 'fast charging' in the modern sense, 10W provides a more reliable and predictable charging experience, reducing the time needed to fully charge the device.
