The sub-$150 smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The itel P65 and Samsung Galaxy A05s represent two compelling options, but cater to slightly different priorities. The itel P65 focuses on providing a solid all-around experience, while the Samsung Galaxy A05s emphasizes display quality and battery endurance, backed by the Qualcomm brand.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing long-lasting battery and a brighter, more vibrant display, the Samsung Galaxy A05s is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 680 chipset, while not a performance king, offers a more efficient experience and faster charging than the itel P65’s Unisoc T615.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 08 | 2023, September 25 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 08 | Available. Released 2023, October 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.9 x 77.3 x 7.9 mm (6.53 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) | 168 x 77.8 x 8.8 mm (6.61 x 3.06 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.4 g (6.81 oz) | 194 g (6.84 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~82.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | PLS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 14, itel OS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, One UI 7 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, AF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.X", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (256/6GB model only) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 40% in 30 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cyber Blaze, Cyber Black, Cyber Titanium | Black, Silver, Light Green, Violet |
| Models | P671L | SM-A057F, SM-A057F/DS, SM-A057M, SM-A057M/DS, SM-A057G/DSN, SM-A057G |
| Price | About 110 EUR | $ 134.00 / C$ 146.99 / £ 83.94 / € 100.99 |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 1.31 W/kg (body) |
itel P65
- Potentially lower price point
- Unisoc T615 is adequate for basic tasks
- May offer expandable storage (market dependent)
- Less efficient Unisoc T615 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Likely inferior display quality
Samsung Galaxy A05s
- Brighter and higher contrast display
- More efficient Snapdragon 680 chipset
- Faster 25W charging
- Longer battery life (11:32h active use)
- Slightly higher price
- May lack expandable storage (market dependent)
- Performance isn't class-leading
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A05s boasts a significantly more impressive display, achieving a measured peak brightness of 468 nits and a 1418:1 contrast ratio. This translates to better visibility outdoors and richer colors. While the itel P65’s display specifications are not provided, it’s reasonable to assume it falls behind in both brightness and contrast, typical for its price bracket. The higher contrast ratio on the A05s will result in deeper blacks and a more immersive viewing experience, particularly for video consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature a camera setup, but details are limited. The Samsung Galaxy A05s likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), which generally delivers better image processing and noise reduction. Without specific sensor size or aperture information for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the A05s’ brand reputation suggests a more refined camera experience, even if it doesn’t boast flagship-level specs. We can assume both phones will include a standard photo and video mode, but the A05s will likely offer better dynamic range and color accuracy.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A05s utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 (6nm), featuring a Kryo CPU configuration with 4x2.4 GHz Gold cores and 4x1.9 GHz Silver cores. This contrasts with the itel P65’s Unisoc T615 (12nm), which employs a 2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The Snapdragon 680’s 6nm process node provides a clear advantage in power efficiency, leading to less heat generation and potentially more sustained performance. While the A05s’ CPU clock speeds are higher, the architectural differences and process node are more impactful for real-world usage, especially in demanding applications. The Unisoc T615 will likely struggle more with multitasking and graphically intensive games.
Battery Life
The Samsung Galaxy A05s shines in battery performance, achieving an active use score of 11 hours and 32 minutes. While the itel P65’s battery capacity is unknown, its 18W charging is slower than the A05s’ 25W charging. This means the A05s can replenish its battery faster, minimizing downtime. The Snapdragon 680’s superior power efficiency further contributes to the A05s’ longer battery life, allowing users to go longer between charges, even with moderate to heavy usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel P65 if you need a dependable device for basic tasks and appreciate a lower price point. It’s a good fit for users who primarily use their phone for calls, messaging, and light social media. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A05s if you prefer a more visually engaging experience with a brighter screen, longer battery life during active use, and the reassurance of Qualcomm’s chipset, even if it means spending slightly more.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 680 in the Samsung A05s handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 680 can run PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at medium settings for a consistently smooth experience. Demanding graphics settings may lead to frame drops. The Unisoc T615 in the itel P65 will likely require even lower settings and may struggle with sustained performance during longer gaming sessions.
❓ How much faster is the 25W charging on the Samsung A05s compared to the itel P65's 18W charging?
The Samsung A05s’ 25W charging will significantly reduce charging times. While exact 0-100% times aren’t available, expect the A05s to charge considerably faster than the itel P65, potentially shaving off 30-60 minutes for a full charge.
❓ Does the Samsung Galaxy A05s support VoLTE and VoWiFi for improved call quality?
Support for VoLTE and VoWiFi varies by carrier and region. The Samsung Galaxy A05s, being a Samsung device, is *likely* to support these features on most major networks, but it's crucial to verify compatibility with your specific carrier before purchasing.
❓ Is the Unisoc T615 chipset known for overheating during prolonged use?
The Unisoc T615 is generally not known for extreme overheating, but it's less thermally efficient than the Snapdragon 680. Prolonged gaming or heavy multitasking may lead to noticeable heat buildup and potential performance throttling.
