The itel P65 and Realme C51s represent the fiercely competitive sub-$150 smartphone market. Both devices leverage Unisoc chipsets to deliver essential functionality, but key differences in charging speed and subtle CPU architecture tweaks create distinct user experiences. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which phone offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing quick top-ups, the Realme C51s is the clear winner thanks to its 33W charging, achieving 50% charge in just 28 minutes. However, the itel P65 remains a viable option for those prioritizing a potentially longer-lasting battery and a slightly lower price point.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, August 08 | 2024, March 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, August 08 | Available. Released 2024, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.9 x 77.3 x 7.9 mm (6.53 x 3.04 x 0.31 in) | 167.2 x 76.7 x 7.5 mm (6.58 x 3.02 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 192.4 g (6.81 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~262 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~260 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.74 inches, 109.7 cm2 (~85.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 560 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T615 (12 nm) | Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G57 |
| OS | Android 14, itel OS 14 | Android 13, Realme UI |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 27mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) | 5 MP, f/2.2, 28mm (wide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 720p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes (256/6GB model only) | Yes, 360˚ (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired, 40% in 30 min | 33W wired, 0-50% in 28 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Cyber Blaze, Cyber Black, Cyber Titanium | Shiny Green, Mighty Black |
| Models | P671L | RMX3765 |
| Price | About 110 EUR | About 100 EUR |
itel P65
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Likely more affordable price point
- Reliable Unisoc T615 chipset for basic tasks
- Significantly slower charging speed (18W)
- Slightly slower Cortex-A55 core clock speed
Realme C51s
- Faster 33W charging (0-50% in 28 minutes)
- Slightly faster Cortex-A55 core clock speed (1.8GHz)
- Potentially smoother multitasking
- May have slightly shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
Display specifications are not provided in the context data. However, given the price bracket, both devices likely feature LCD panels with 720p+ resolution. Expect similar viewing experiences, with color accuracy and brightness being key differentiators not specified here. Bezels are also likely to be comparable, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over premium aesthetics.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are absent from the provided data. In this price segment, expect basic camera setups focused on affordability. Image quality will likely be heavily reliant on software processing, and low-light performance will be limited. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering minimal practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of optical image stabilization (OIS).
Performance
Both the itel P65 and Realme C51s utilize 12nm Unisoc chipsets, but the Realme C51s employs the Tiger T612, while the itel P65 uses the T615. The core CPU configuration is similar – both feature two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores. However, the Realme C51s bumps the Cortex-A55 clock speed to 1.8GHz, compared to the itel P65’s 1.6GHz. This subtle increase in the efficiency core clock speed *could* translate to slightly snappier performance in multi-tasking and background processes, though the real-world difference will likely be minimal. Neither chipset is designed for demanding gaming, but both should handle everyday tasks like social media, web browsing, and video playback adequately.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn't specified, the charging capabilities are a significant differentiator. The Realme C51s boasts 33W wired charging, capable of reaching 50% charge in 28 minutes. The itel P65, with its 18W charging, is considerably slower, taking 30 minutes to reach 40%. This means the Realme C51s offers a much faster turnaround time for topping up the battery, a crucial advantage for users on the go. Without knowing the battery capacities, it's difficult to definitively say which phone offers better overall battery life, but the faster charging of the Realme C51s mitigates any potential capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel P65 if you need a dependable, long-lasting battery and are comfortable with slower charging speeds. It's ideal for users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks and don't mind waiting longer between charges. Buy the Realme C51s if you prefer faster charging and a slightly more responsive experience, even if it means potentially sacrificing some overall battery life. This phone suits users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost throughout the day.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc Tiger T612 in the Realme C51s handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
The Unisoc Tiger T612 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but expect to play at lower graphics settings and frame rates to maintain a stable experience. It's not a gaming-focused chipset, so demanding titles will likely result in noticeable lag and frame drops.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Realme C51s compared to the 18W charging on the itel P65 in real-world use?
The Realme C51s' 33W charging provides a substantial advantage. Reaching 50% charge in 28 minutes versus 40% in 30 minutes for the itel P65 means you'll gain a usable amount of battery life much quicker, reducing downtime and making it ideal for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does either phone support reverse wireless charging?
Neither the itel P65 nor the Realme C51s are expected to support reverse wireless charging given their price point and target market. This feature is typically reserved for higher-end smartphones.
