itel P55 vs. Google Pixel 6a: A Deep Dive into Budget and Brains
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality, software experience, and long-term support, the Google Pixel 6a is the clear winner. However, the itel P55 presents a compelling option for those on a very tight budget who prioritize basic functionality and battery life over premium features.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | itel P55 | Google Pixel 6a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66, 71 - GX7AS, GB62Z (USA/Canada) |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GX7AS (USA/Canada) |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 30, 40, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - G1AZG (International) | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, January 26 | 2022, May 11 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, January 31 | Available. Released 2022, July 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 8.0 mm thickness | 152.2 x 71.8 x 8.9 mm (5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 190 g (6.70 oz) | 178 g (6.28 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~83.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, HDR |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.80 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.25 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Google Tensor (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G78 MP20 |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | No |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 12.2 MP, f/1.7, 27mm, (wide), 1/2.55", 1.4µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 12 MP, f/2.2, 17mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1.25µm |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP Auxiliary lens | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1.12µm |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4410 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Aurora Blue, Brilliant Gold, Moonlit Black, Starry Purple | Chalk, Charcoal, Sage |
| Models | A666L, A666LN, P666L | GX7AS, GB62Z, G1AZG, GB17L |
| Price | - | $ 138.99 / C$ 228.74 / ₹ 23,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 94h |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
itel P55
- Extremely affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to less powerful processor
- Simple and straightforward user experience
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Pixel 6a
- Inferior camera quality
- Limited software updates and support
Google Pixel 6a
- Powerful Google Tensor chip for smooth performance
- Excellent camera quality with Google’s computational photography
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Higher price compared to the itel P55
- May experience some thermal throttling under heavy load
- Charging speed is relatively slow compared to some competitors
Display Comparison
The Pixel 6a boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 876 nits, compared to the itel P55 (brightness unspecified). This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize LCD panels given their price points, the Pixel 6a’s infinite (nominal) contrast ratio suggests superior black levels. The itel P55’s display specs are minimal, suggesting a focus on cost reduction rather than visual fidelity. Users who consume a lot of media outdoors will greatly benefit from the Pixel 6a’s brighter screen.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 6a’s camera system is a major advantage. While specific sensor details aren’t provided in the context data, Google’s computational photography prowess is well-known. The Pixel 6a excels in dynamic range, low-light performance, and image stabilization. The itel P55’s camera specs are not detailed enough to make a meaningful comparison, but given its price point, it’s unlikely to compete with the Pixel 6a’s image quality. The Pixel 6a’s image processing algorithms will benefit users who frequently take photos in challenging conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 6a’s Google Tensor (5nm) is a flagship-level processor featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.80 GHz, designed for demanding tasks and AI processing. The itel P55 utilizes the Unisoc T606 (12nm), an entry-level chipset with a Cortex-A75 prime core at 1.6 GHz. This architectural difference is substantial; the Tensor’s 5nm process is far more efficient, delivering more performance per watt and reducing thermal throttling. The Pixel 6a will handle multitasking, gaming, and camera processing with ease, while the itel P55 will struggle with more intensive applications. The Pixel 6a’s LPDDR5 RAM (spec not provided for itel P55) further enhances responsiveness.
Battery Life
Interestingly, both phones share an endurance rating of 94 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the significant chipset differences. However, this is likely due to the itel P55’s less demanding processor and potentially larger battery capacity (unspecified). Both support 18W wired charging, but the Pixel 6a adds PD3.0 support for faster and more efficient charging with compatible chargers. While both achieve similar endurance, the Pixel 6a’s faster charging and more efficient processor offer a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel P55 if you need a reliable, extremely affordable smartphone for essential tasks like calls, messaging, and light social media use, and battery life is paramount. Buy the Google Pixel 6a if you prefer a superior camera experience, a smoother and more intelligent software experience powered by the Google Tensor chip, and guaranteed software updates for years to come, even if it means a higher upfront cost.