The itel P40+ and Tecno Spark 10 Pro represent compelling options in the ultra-budget smartphone segment. Both aim to deliver essential features at a low price point, but they take different approaches to achieving this. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best value for your money, focusing on performance, display quality, and battery endurance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Tecno Spark 10 Pro emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share 18W charging and similar battery endurance ratings, the Tecno’s Helio G88 chipset offers a noticeable performance advantage over the itel P40+'s Unisoc T606, making it more suitable for gaming and demanding applications.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023 | Available. Released 2023, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 8.9 mm thickness | 168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~263 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 | 6.8 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12 or 13 | Android 13, HIOS 12.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 13 MP
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
other unspecified cameras |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Force Black, Ice Cyan | Starry Black, Pearl White |
| Models | P683L | KI7 |
| Price | - | £ 245.74 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 131h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1991:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 249938 (v9)
GeekBench: 1358 (v5.1), 1376 (v6)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
itel P40+
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Acceptable battery life
- Less powerful Unisoc T606 chipset
- Likely lower display brightness
- Limited gaming capabilities
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
- More powerful MediaTek Helio G88 chipset
- Brighter display for better outdoor visibility
- Improved gaming performance
- Slightly higher price
- Similar charging speed to itel P40+
- Camera performance likely limited by sensor quality
Display Comparison
The Tecno Spark 10 Pro boasts a measured peak brightness of 521 nits, significantly enhancing outdoor visibility compared to the itel P40+, which lacks published brightness data. Both displays share a 1991:1 contrast ratio, suggesting similar black levels and color depth. However, the Tecno’s higher brightness translates to a more usable experience in direct sunlight. While both are likely LCD panels given the price point, the Tecno’s superior brightness is a clear advantage for media consumption and general usability.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size or image processing. Given the price bracket, it’s safe to assume both rely on relatively basic camera setups. The absence of details suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography. Focusing on the chipset, the Helio G88 in the Tecno Spark 10 Pro benefits from a more capable ISP (Image Signal Processor) which could lead to slightly better image quality and faster processing times. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on both is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The Tecno Spark 10 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G88 chipset, with its 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, provides a performance edge over the itel P40+'s Unisoc T606 (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55). The higher clock speeds on the G88, coupled with a slightly more efficient architecture, result in smoother multitasking and improved gaming performance. While both are 12nm chips, the G88 is optimized for gaming, offering a better experience in titles like PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile. The itel P40+ will handle basic tasks adequately, but will struggle with more demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both the itel P40+ and Tecno Spark 10 Pro share an endurance rating of 131 hours, indicating comparable battery life under similar usage conditions. Both also feature 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. While the itel P40+ might have a slightly larger battery capacity (unconfirmed), the more efficient Helio G88 in the Tecno Spark 10 Pro could offset this difference, resulting in similar real-world battery performance. Expect approximately 2-3 hours of screen-on time with moderate usage on both devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel P40+ if your primary need is a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and light social media use, and you prioritize a minimal cost. Buy the Tecno Spark 10 Pro if you want a more responsive experience for everyday use, enjoy occasional mobile gaming, and appreciate a brighter, more vibrant display. The Tecno offers a better balance of features for a slightly higher investment.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Spark 10 Pro handle popular games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Helio G88 chipset in the Tecno Spark 10 Pro is specifically designed for gaming. While you won't achieve ultra-high frame rates, you can expect playable performance at medium settings. The itel P40+ with its Unisoc T606 will struggle with PUBG, likely requiring very low settings and experiencing noticeable lag.
❓ Is the 131-hour endurance rating realistic for everyday use?
The 131-hour endurance rating is based on a standardized test that simulates typical smartphone usage. Your actual battery life will vary depending on your usage patterns, such as screen brightness, app usage, and network connectivity. However, both phones should comfortably last a full day with moderate use.
❓ Does either phone support fast charging beyond 18W?
Neither the itel P40+ nor the Tecno Spark 10 Pro officially support charging speeds exceeding 18W. While they might work with faster chargers, they will only draw power at the 18W rate. Expect a full charge to take approximately 2-3 hours.
