The itel A95 and Vision 3 Turbo represent itel’s approach to the ultra-budget smartphone market. However, they diverge significantly in their core processing power. The A95 boasts a modern Mediatek Dimensity 6300, while the Vision 3 Turbo relies on the older Unisoc SC9863A. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device delivers the best experience for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the itel A95 is the superior choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Unisoc SC9863A in the Vision 3 Turbo, translating to smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and a more responsive user experience. While both offer 18W charging, the A95’s processing power justifies its slightly higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 17 | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~265 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 106.9 cm2 | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 14, itel OS 14 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 8 MP (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Calx Titanium, Black, Green | Blue |
| Price | ₹ 10,265 | - |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) | - |
itel A95
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 6300)
- Better thermal efficiency
- Improved image processing capabilities
- Likely slightly higher price
- May not have significantly better display quality
itel Vision 3 Turbo
- Lower price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Acceptable battery life for light usage
- Slow processor (Unisoc SC9863A)
- Poor performance with multitasking
- Limited gaming capabilities
Display Comparison
Neither itel provides display specifications beyond resolution. However, given the price bracket, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The key difference lies in the processing power driving the display; the A95’s Dimensity 6300 will handle UI animations and video playback more smoothly. The older Unisoc chip in the Vision 3 Turbo may exhibit noticeable lag during transitions. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles on both devices, typical of budget IPS LCDs.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially a depth or macro sensor. However, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 6300 will offer superior image processing capabilities, resulting in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. Expect the A95 to produce more detailed and vibrant photos, especially in challenging lighting conditions. The Vision 3 Turbo will likely struggle with low-light photography.
Performance
The performance gap is the defining factor here. The itel A95’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) features a modern CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores – offering significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance than the Unisoc SC9863A (28nm). The Unisoc chip’s 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores are considerably less powerful. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. This translates to a more consistent and responsive experience on the A95.
Battery Life
Both devices support 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. However, the more efficient Dimensity 6300 in the A95 will likely result in better battery life despite potentially having a similar battery capacity. The 6nm process node consumes less power than the 28nm node of the Unisoc chip. While both should last a full day with moderate use, the A95 will likely offer more headroom for power-intensive tasks like gaming or video streaming.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel A95 if you prioritize performance for everyday tasks, occasional gaming, and future-proofing. Its Dimensity 6300 chipset will handle demanding apps and multitasking with ease. Buy the itel Vision 3 Turbo if your needs are extremely basic – primarily calls, texts, and light social media – and you are seeking the absolute lowest possible price point. The Vision 3 Turbo is a functional device for minimal smartphone usage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the itel Vision 3 Turbo struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Vision 3 Turbo can run these apps, expect slower loading times and occasional lag, especially when switching between them. The Unisoc SC9863A is simply not powerful enough to handle multitasking efficiently. The A95 will provide a much smoother experience.
❓ Can I play games like PUBG Mobile on the itel A95?
You can *attempt* to play PUBG Mobile on the itel A95, but don't expect high frame rates or graphics settings. The Dimensity 6300 is capable of running the game at low settings, but it may experience occasional frame drops during intense action. The Vision 3 Turbo is unlikely to run PUBG Mobile smoothly.
❓ Does the itel A95 support fast charging beyond 18W?
No, both devices are limited to 18W wired charging. While not the fastest charging available, it's adequate for these budget smartphones. The A95's more efficient processor may reach full charge slightly faster due to reduced power draw during charging.
❓ Is the difference in processor performance noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The difference between the Dimensity 6300 and the Unisoc SC9863A is very noticeable in everyday tasks like opening apps, browsing the web, and scrolling through social media. The A95 feels significantly more responsive and fluid.
