The itel A95 and Vision 2S represent two distinct approaches to the ultra-budget smartphone market. The Vision 2S aims for maximum affordability, while the A95 attempts to deliver a more compelling experience with a significantly more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the itel A95 is the superior choice. The Mediatek Dimensity 6300 offers a substantial performance uplift over the Unisoc SC9863A, making the A95 noticeably faster in everyday tasks and capable of handling more demanding applications. While both phones offer 18W charging, the A95’s processing power justifies its likely higher price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 17 | 2021 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2021 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 166 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~265 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 106.9 cm2 | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 14, itel OS 14 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
0.3 MP |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Calx Titanium, Black, Green | Gradation Purple, Gradation Blue, Deep Blue |
| Price | ₹ 10,265 | - |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) | - |
itel A95
- Significantly faster processor for smoother performance
- More power-efficient chipset for longer battery life
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Potential for future software updates
- Likely higher price point
- May not have a significantly better display
itel Vision 2S
- More affordable price
- Functional for basic tasks
- Acceptable battery life for light usage
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Slow processor and limited performance
- Poor performance in demanding apps and games
- Lower quality camera
- Less efficient chipset
Display Comparison
Neither itel provides display specifications beyond resolution, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The A95’s more powerful chipset *could* support higher refresh rates, though this isn’t confirmed. The older Unisoc chipset in the Vision 2S is unlikely to support anything beyond a standard 60Hz refresh rate. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, typical of this market segment. Color accuracy will likely be similar, leaning towards the warmer side to be more visually appealing to a wider audience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, analysis is limited. Both phones likely feature a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth or macro sensor. However, the image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 6300 will offer superior image processing capabilities compared to the Unisoc SC9863A. This means better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality on the A95, even with similar sensor sizes. The Vision 2S will likely struggle in low-light conditions due to the limitations of its chipset and ISP. Any 2MP macro sensors on either device should be considered a marketing feature rather than a significant photographic asset.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The itel A95’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6nm) is a modern processor featuring a combination of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This architecture provides a significant performance advantage over the itel Vision 2S’s Unisoc SC9863A (28nm), which uses a less efficient octa-core configuration of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 6300 also translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling. Users will experience faster app loading times, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience on the A95. The A95 is the clear winner for anyone planning to use their phone for anything beyond basic tasks.
Battery Life
Both devices feature 18W wired charging, suggesting similar charging speeds. However, the Dimensity 6300’s superior power efficiency in the A95 could translate to slightly longer battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity battery. The 28nm process of the Unisoc SC9863A is inherently less efficient, meaning the Vision 2S will likely drain its battery faster under similar usage conditions. While 18W charging isn’t particularly fast, it’s adequate for this price range.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel A95 if you prioritize responsiveness, smoother multitasking, and the ability to run more apps without lag. This phone is ideal for users who occasionally play mobile games or need a device that can handle productivity tasks. Buy the itel Vision 2S if your primary needs are basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media – and you are on a very strict budget. It’s a functional device for those who prioritize affordability above all else.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the itel A95 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
The Mediatek Dimensity 6300 in the A95 is capable of running PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty, but likely at medium graphics settings and frame rates. Expect some occasional frame drops during intense scenes. The Vision 2S’s Unisoc SC9863A will struggle significantly with these titles, offering a poor gaming experience.
❓ Is the 18W charging on either phone considered fast charging?
18W charging is considered relatively slow by today’s standards, but it’s acceptable for phones in this price range. Expect a full charge to take around 2-3 hours. The charging speed will be similar on both devices, but the A95’s more efficient chipset might reach a full charge slightly faster due to optimized power management.
❓ How much storage does each phone offer, and is it expandable?
While not specified in the provided data, itel typically offers 32GB or 64GB of internal storage in this segment, with microSD card support for expansion. Check the product listing for the exact storage configuration.
❓ What version of Android do these phones run?
Both phones likely run a relatively recent version of Android (potentially Android 12 or 13) with itel’s custom UI. However, software update support is typically limited on ultra-budget devices, so don’t expect frequent updates.
