The itel A95 and A49 represent itel’s commitment to the ultra-budget smartphone market. However, a significant gap exists between their internal hardware. The A95, powered by a Mediatek Dimensity 6300, aims to deliver a smoother experience than the A49’s older Unisoc SC9832E. This comparison dissects the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the itel A95 is the clear winner. Its Mediatek Dimensity 6300 chipset provides a substantial performance advantage over the A49’s Unisoc SC9832E, making it better suited for multitasking, gaming, and overall responsiveness. While the A49 is cheaper, the A95’s improved performance justifies the price difference.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 17 | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Panda Glass | - |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~265 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 106.9 cm2 | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Quad-core 1.4 GHz |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6300 (6 nm) | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| OS | Android 14, itel OS 14 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | 5 MP |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | - |
| Type | Li-Po 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Calx Titanium, Black, Green | Blue |
| Price | ₹ 10,265 | - |
| SAR | 1.12 W/kg (head) 0.79 W/kg (body) | - |
itel A95
- Significantly faster processor (Dimensity 6300)
- More efficient 6nm process
- Faster 18W charging
- Better multitasking capabilities
- Likely slightly higher price
- May not have significant camera improvements without further specs
itel A49
- Lower price point
- Sufficient for basic tasks
- Simple and easy to use
- Potentially longer battery life due to less demanding processor (though offset by efficiency)
- Slow processor (Unisoc SC9832E)
- Inefficient 28nm process
- Limited multitasking capabilities
- Slower charging speeds
Display Comparison
Both devices likely feature LCD panels, typical for this price segment. However, specifics like resolution and brightness are not provided. The A95’s advantage lies elsewhere. The A49’s older chipset likely limits its ability to efficiently drive a higher-resolution display, even if one were present. The focus here isn’t display quality, but the chipset’s ability to support it.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the A95’s more powerful chipset allows for more sophisticated image processing. The A49’s Unisoc SC9832E likely lacks the processing power for advanced features like HDR or noise reduction. Both phones likely feature basic camera setups, and image quality will be heavily reliant on software optimization, where the A95 has a clear advantage.
Performance
The performance disparity is the defining factor. The itel A95’s Mediatek Dimensity 6300, built on a 6nm process, is a modern octa-core processor with two high-performance Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and six efficiency cores at 2.0 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the itel A49’s Unisoc SC9832E, a quad-core 1.4 GHz processor fabricated on a significantly older 28nm node. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 6300 translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling, allowing sustained performance. The A76 cores provide a substantial uplift in single-core and multi-core performance, making the A95 far more capable of handling demanding tasks.
Battery Life
While battery capacity isn’t specified, the itel A95’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the A49, which likely supports slower charging speeds. The Dimensity 6300’s 6nm process also contributes to better power efficiency, potentially offsetting any capacity differences. Faster charging means less downtime and quicker top-ups throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel A95 if you prioritize a responsive user experience, enjoy occasional gaming, or frequently use multiple apps simultaneously. The Dimensity 6300 chipset will significantly improve daily usability. Buy the itel A49 if your needs are extremely basic – primarily calls, texts, and light social media – and you are on the tightest possible budget. The A49 will suffice for minimal smartphone tasks.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the itel A95 handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty?
While the Dimensity 6300 isn't a gaming powerhouse, it's significantly more capable than the Unisoc SC9832E. You'll likely be able to play PUBG Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some compromises in graphics quality for smoother gameplay. The A49 would struggle significantly with these titles.
❓ Is the difference in processor speed noticeable in everyday use?
Absolutely. The itel A95’s Dimensity 6300 will result in snappier app launches, smoother scrolling, and a more responsive overall experience. The A49’s Unisoc SC9832E will feel sluggish when multitasking or running demanding apps. The difference is particularly noticeable when switching between applications.
❓ Does the itel A95 support fast web browsing and video streaming?
Yes, the Dimensity 6300’s processing power and likely improved GPU performance will provide a much smoother experience for web browsing and video streaming. You’ll encounter fewer lags and buffering issues compared to the A49.
❓ How much more expensive is the itel A95 compared to the itel A49?
The price difference varies by region and retailer, but the A95 typically costs between $30 and $50 more than the A49. This price premium is a worthwhile investment for users who value performance and responsiveness.
