The itel A90 and A49 represent itel’s commitment to providing accessible smartphones. Both devices target the ultra-budget market, but a significant difference in their core processing power – the Unisoc T7100 in the A90 versus the SC9832E in the A49 – dictates their real-world performance. This comparison dives deep into these differences to help you determine which phone best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the itel A90 is the superior choice. Its Unisoc T7100 chipset, featuring an octa-core CPU clocked at 1.8 GHz, delivers a noticeably smoother experience than the quad-core 1.4 GHz SC9832E in the A49. While both phones are entry-level, the A90 offers a more future-proofed platform for app usage and multitasking.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, April 20 | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, April | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 8.6 mm thickness | - |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | 187 g (6.60 oz) | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ), 1500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core 1.8 GHz | Quad-core 1.4 GHz |
| Chipset | Unisoc T7100 | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) |
| GPU | PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| OS | Android 14, itel OS 14 | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 256GB 4GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF
Auxiliary lens | 5 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | microUSB |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 15W wired | - |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Starlit Black, Space Titanium, Aurora Blue, Cosmic Green | Blue |
| Models | A6610L | - |
| Price | $ 76.23 | - |
itel A90
- Faster processor for smoother performance
- More responsive user experience
- Potentially better battery efficiency
- May be slightly more expensive than the A49
- Still an entry-level device with limitations
itel A49
- Extremely affordable
- Functional for basic communication
- Simple and easy to use
- Slow processor and limited performance
- Struggles with multitasking and demanding apps
- Less future-proof
Display Comparison
Neither itel provides detailed display specifications beyond size. However, given the price point, both likely utilize LCD panels. The difference in processing power suggests the A90 may be able to handle slightly more complex display rendering, but this is unlikely to be a major differentiator. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, reflecting their budget nature. Color accuracy is likely to be standard for this segment, prioritizing power efficiency over fidelity.
Camera Comparison
Both phones likely feature basic camera setups, and detailed sensor information is unavailable. It's safe to assume both will include a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth sensor. Given the price bracket, image quality will be heavily reliant on software processing. The A90’s more powerful processor *could* allow for slightly more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in marginally better photos, but the difference will likely be minimal. Focusing on the chipset difference, the A90's processor will be able to handle camera software more efficiently.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The itel A90’s Unisoc T7100 is an octa-core processor clocked at 1.8 GHz, offering significantly more processing power than the itel A49’s Unisoc SC9832E, a quad-core processor running at 1.4 GHz. This translates to faster app launch times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user interface on the A90. The T7100’s architecture is also more modern, potentially offering better efficiency. While neither phone is a gaming powerhouse, the A90 will handle less demanding games with greater ease. The A49, with its older chipset, will struggle with even moderately demanding applications.
Battery Life
Both phones feature 15W wired charging. While battery capacity isn't specified, it's reasonable to expect similar capacities (around 4000-5000 mAh) given their target market. The A90’s more efficient processor *may* translate to slightly longer battery life under moderate usage, but the difference will likely be marginal. The 15W charging speed is relatively slow on both devices, meaning a full charge will take several hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel A90 if you need a phone capable of handling more than basic tasks like calls and messaging. It’s ideal for users who occasionally browse social media, use light apps, or want a slightly more responsive experience. Buy the itel A49 if your primary needs are extremely basic communication and you prioritize absolute affordability above all else. It’s a functional device for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup phone.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the itel A90 handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc T7100 chipset in the itel A90 provides enough processing power to run Facebook, WhatsApp, and similar social media apps without significant lag. While it won't offer a flagship-level experience, it will be a noticeable improvement over the A49 for these tasks.
❓ Is the itel A49 suitable for someone who primarily uses their phone for calls and texts?
Absolutely. The itel A49 excels at basic communication functions. Its quad-core processor is sufficient for making calls, sending texts, and using simple contact apps. If these are your primary needs, the A49 is a functional and affordable option.
❓ Can I play games on either of these phones?
While both phones can technically run games, the experience will be limited. The itel A90 will handle less demanding 2D games and older 3D titles with moderate settings. The A49 will struggle with most games, even at the lowest settings. Don't expect a smooth gaming experience on either device.
❓ What kind of storage options are available on these phones?
Storage options are not explicitly stated in the provided data. However, given the price point, both phones likely offer limited internal storage (around 32GB) and support for microSD card expansion. This is crucial for storing photos, videos, and apps.
