The itel A60 and Vision 2S represent itel’s commitment to the ultra-budget smartphone market. While both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at incredibly low price points, they differ significantly in their internal hardware, particularly in processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison will dissect those differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the itel Vision 2S is the superior choice. Its Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor provides a noticeably smoother experience for multitasking and app usage compared to the A60’s quad-core chip. The 18W charging also significantly reduces downtime, making it a more practical daily driver.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2021 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 166 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 11 or 12 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 8 MP
0.3 MP | 8 MP
0.3 MP |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB, OTG | microUSB |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dawn Blue, Vert Menthe, Sapphire Black | Gradation Purple, Gradation Blue, Deep Blue |
itel A60
- Extremely affordable price point
- Simple and easy-to-use interface
- Reliable for basic communication tasks
- Slow processor struggles with multitasking
- Slow 10W charging
- Limited performance for modern apps
itel Vision 2S
- Faster octa-core processor for smoother performance
- 18W fast charging reduces downtime
- More responsive user experience
- Slightly higher price than the itel A60
- Still limited by budget components
- Camera performance likely remains basic
Display Comparison
Both the itel A60 and Vision 2S likely feature similar LCD panels, given their price bracket. Specific details like resolution and brightness are not provided, but we can assume they are optimized for power efficiency rather than visual fidelity. The absence of information regarding refresh rates suggests both operate at the standard 60Hz. Bezels are expected to be relatively thick on both devices, a common characteristic of budget smartphones.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information, a direct camera comparison is difficult. However, it's safe to assume both phones feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. The focus should be on the primary sensor; any additional sensors (likely 2MP macro or depth sensors) will offer limited utility. Image processing will likely be minimal on both devices, relying heavily on software optimization to enhance image quality. The Vision 2S *may* benefit from slightly improved image processing capabilities due to its more powerful processor, allowing for faster image capture and processing.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The itel A60 utilizes the Unisoc SC9832E, a quad-core processor built on a 28nm process. This is adequate for basic tasks but will struggle with demanding applications. The Vision 2S, however, boasts the Unisoc SC9863A, an octa-core processor (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) also on a 28nm node. The octa-core configuration, with its more powerful Cortex-A55 cores, provides a significant performance boost, especially in multitasking and app loading times. This translates to a smoother, more responsive user experience for the Vision 2S. While both use the same process node, the architectural advantage of the SC9863A is substantial.
Battery Life
Battery capacity isn't specified for either device, but both likely house batteries in the 4000-5000 mAh range, typical for this segment. The key differentiator is charging speed. The itel A60 supports 10W wired charging, which will result in a relatively slow charging time. The Vision 2S, with its 18W wired charging, offers a significantly faster charging experience, reducing downtime and making it more convenient for users who rely on their phones throughout the day. This faster charging capability is a major advantage for the Vision 2S.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel A60 if you prioritize extreme affordability and only need a phone for very basic tasks like calls, texts, and light social media. It’s a suitable option for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup device. Buy the itel Vision 2S if you value a more responsive user experience, faster charging, and the ability to handle a wider range of apps without significant lag. It’s the better choice for anyone who wants a functional smartphone without compromising too much on performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the itel Vision 2S handle popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A octa-core processor in the Vision 2S is significantly better equipped to handle everyday apps like WhatsApp and Facebook compared to the quad-core processor in the A60. You should experience smoother scrolling and faster app loading times.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the itel A60 and Vision 2S?
Due to the 10W charging on the A60, a full charge will likely take over 3 hours. The Vision 2S, with its 18W charging, should charge significantly faster, potentially reaching 100% in around 2 hours, depending on usage during charging.
❓ Is the itel Vision 2S suitable for playing mobile games?
While the Vision 2S is not a gaming phone, its octa-core processor will allow for playable frame rates in less demanding mobile games. However, graphically intensive games may experience lag or require reduced graphics settings.
❓ Do either of these phones support 4G LTE?
While not explicitly stated, itel phones in this price range typically support 4G LTE connectivity. However, specific band support may vary by region, so it's best to check with your carrier for compatibility.
