The itel A50 and Vision 3 Turbo represent itel’s commitment to the ultra-budget smartphone market. Both devices aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at incredibly accessible price points. However, they differ significantly in their internal hardware, particularly in their chipsets and charging capabilities, making a direct comparison crucial for budget-conscious consumers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the itel Vision 3 Turbo is the better choice. While both phones offer basic functionality, the Turbo’s 18W charging and slightly more modern (though still entry-level) chipset provide a noticeably improved user experience, especially for multitasking and app loading times.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, May | 2022 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2022 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 163.9 x 75.7 x 8.7 mm (6.45 x 2.98 x 0.34 in) | - |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~267 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 104.6 cm2 (~84.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD, 480 nits (peak) | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc T603 | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | - | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 14 (Go edition) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 64GB 2GB RAM, 64GB 3GB RAM, 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 3GB RAM | 64GB 3GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 8 MP
auxiliary lens | 8 MP (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | microUSB |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted); unspecified sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 10W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Shimmer Gold, Суаn Blue, Lime Green, Misty Black | Blue |
| Models | A507LXU | - |
itel A50
- Lowest possible price point
- Functional for basic tasks
- Reliable for calls and texts
- Slow 10W charging
- Less efficient chipset
- Limited multitasking capabilities
itel Vision 3 Turbo
- Faster 18W charging
- Slightly more balanced chipset
- Improved multitasking potential
- Older 28nm process
- Still limited for demanding tasks
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Neither itel provides display specifications beyond size, so a detailed comparison is limited. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The absence of information regarding resolution, brightness, or color gamut suggests a focus on cost reduction over display quality. Expect basic viewing experiences suitable for indoor use, but potentially washed out in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. It’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to assess image quality. The presence of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, as the image quality from such sensors is typically poor. The focus should be on the main camera’s performance, which will likely be similar given the shared price point and target market.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The itel Vision 3 Turbo utilizes the Unisoc SC9863A, a 28nm octa-core processor with a split core configuration of 4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55. This contrasts with the itel A50’s Unisoc T603, an octa-core processor without detailed core clock information. While both are octa-core, the SC9863A’s architecture suggests a slightly more balanced approach to performance, potentially offering better multitasking capabilities. The older 28nm process of the SC9863A will likely result in higher power consumption compared to a more modern node, but the difference may be negligible in typical usage scenarios. Neither chipset is designed for demanding gaming or intensive applications.
Battery Life
Both phones likely feature similar battery capacities, typical for the budget segment (around 4000-5000 mAh, based on market trends). However, the itel Vision 3 Turbo’s 18W wired charging is a significant advantage over the itel A50’s 10W charging. This translates to substantially faster charging times, reducing the time spent tethered to a power outlet. A full charge on the Vision 3 Turbo could take around 2-3 hours, while the A50 may require 4-5 hours, making the Turbo more convenient for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel A50 if you prioritize absolute affordability and only need a phone for basic communication – calls, texts, and light social media. It’s a functional device for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup. Buy the itel Vision 3 Turbo if you value faster charging and a slightly smoother experience with everyday apps. The 18W charging is a significant advantage, reducing downtime and making the phone more convenient for active users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the itel Vision 3 Turbo handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Unisoc SC9863A chipset in the Vision 3 Turbo is capable of running social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp without significant lag. While it won’t offer a high-end experience, it provides a usable and responsive experience for these common tasks. The A50 will also run these apps, but may exhibit slightly more slowdown during multitasking.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge the itel A50 and itel Vision 3 Turbo?
With its 10W charging, the itel A50 is estimated to take approximately 4-5 hours for a full charge from 0%. The itel Vision 3 Turbo, benefiting from its 18W charging, can achieve a full charge in around 2-3 hours. This difference in charging speed is a key advantage for the Vision 3 Turbo, especially for users who need to quickly replenish their battery.
❓ Can either of these phones play PUBG Mobile?
While technically possible to *launch* PUBG Mobile on both devices, the experience will be far from ideal. The Unisoc chipsets lack the graphical power to run the game smoothly, even at the lowest settings. Expect significant frame rate drops and lag, making the game largely unplayable. These phones are not designed for gaming.
