The itel A25 and Vision 2S represent itel’s commitment to the ultra-budget smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential smartphone functionality at a low price point, they differ significantly in processing power and charging capabilities. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for users prioritizing performance or convenience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the itel Vision 2S is the superior choice. Its octa-core Unisoc SC9863A chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the A25’s quad-core SC9832E, making it better suited for multitasking and slightly more demanding apps. The inclusion of 18W charging is a significant convenience factor, offsetting the likely similar battery capacities.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020. Released 2020 | 2021 |
| Status | Discontinued | Available. Released 2021 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | 166 x 76.3 x 8.9 mm (6.54 x 3.00 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~269 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 | 6.52 inches, 102.6 cm2 (~81.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Octa-core (4x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 & 4x1.2 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Unisoc SC9863A (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | IMG8322 |
| OS | Android 9.0 (Pie) | Android 11 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 8 MP
0.3 MP |
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 5 MP | - |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB | microUSB |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | - | 18W wired |
| Type | 3020 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Violet, Blue | Gradation Purple, Gradation Blue, Deep Blue |
itel A25
- Lowest possible price point
- Simple and easy to use
- Reliable for basic communication
- Slow performance
- Slow charging
- Limited multitasking capabilities
itel Vision 2S
- Faster octa-core processor
- 18W fast charging
- Improved multitasking performance
- Slightly higher price
- May still struggle with demanding apps
- Likely similar battery capacity to A25
Display Comparison
Neither itel provides display specifications beyond size, so a detailed comparison is limited. Both likely utilize LCD panels given the price bracket. The focus here is on the processing power needed to drive the display, which favors the Vision 2S. Bezels are expected to be substantial on both devices, and color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable. However, given the price point, both devices likely feature basic camera setups. It’s reasonable to assume both will include a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth sensor. Image processing will be handled by the chipset’s ISP, and the Vision 2S’s more powerful processor should offer slightly better image processing capabilities, resulting in marginally improved photo quality. The absence of OIS or high-resolution sensors suggests both cameras will struggle in low-light conditions.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The itel A25’s Unisoc SC9832E is a quad-core processor clocked at 1.4 GHz. In contrast, the Vision 2S boasts the Unisoc SC9863A, an octa-core chip with a heterogeneous core configuration – four cores at 1.6 GHz (Cortex-A55) and four at 1.2 GHz (Cortex-A55). This architecture allows the Vision 2S to handle more complex tasks and multitasking more efficiently. The A55 cores, while not high-performance, are significantly more capable than the cores found in the SC9832E. This translates to faster app loading times and a more responsive user interface on the Vision 2S. Both chipsets are built on a 28nm process, meaning thermal efficiency will be similar, but the Vision 2S will complete tasks faster before generating heat.
Battery Life
Battery capacity details are missing for both devices. However, considering their target market, both likely house batteries in the 3000-4000 mAh range. The key differentiator is the Vision 2S’s 18W wired charging support. While the A25 likely supports standard 5W charging, the 18W charging on the Vision 2S will significantly reduce charging times, offering a more convenient user experience. This faster charging capability is a substantial advantage for users who rely heavily on their smartphones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel A25 if you need a truly basic smartphone for calls, texts, and very light app usage, and prioritize absolute affordability. It’s ideal for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup device. Buy the itel Vision 2S if you prefer a smoother user experience, occasionally use multiple apps simultaneously, or value faster charging – even if it means spending a little more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the itel Vision 2S handle popular social media apps like Facebook and WhatsApp smoothly?
Yes, the Vision 2S’s octa-core processor and likely increased RAM (though unspecified) should provide a noticeably smoother experience with social media apps compared to the A25. While it won’t be a flagship-level experience, basic scrolling, posting, and messaging should be fluid.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Vision 2S compatible with any USB charger, or do I need a specific itel charger?
The 18W charging on the Vision 2S is compatible with any USB-C Power Delivery (PD) charger that supports 18W output. However, using the charger included in the box is recommended for optimal performance and safety. Using a lower wattage charger will still charge the phone, but at a slower rate.
❓ Can I play basic games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers on the itel A25 without significant lag?
Yes, the itel A25 can handle simple, less demanding games like Candy Crush or Subway Surfers. However, expect longer loading times and occasional frame drops, especially during more intense gameplay. The Vision 2S will provide a significantly better gaming experience, even with similar games.
