The itel A23S and A48 represent the extreme end of the budget smartphone market, aiming to deliver essential functionality at the lowest possible price point. Both devices utilize the same Unisoc SC9832E chipset, making a direct comparison crucial for consumers seeking maximum value. This analysis will dissect their similarities and subtle differences to determine which phone offers the better overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing basic smartphone functionality, the itel A48 emerges as the slightly better choice. While both phones share the same core processor, the A48's potential for software optimization and slightly larger battery capacity provide a marginal advantage in real-world usability. However, the A23S remains a viable option if priced significantly lower.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022 | 2021 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022 | Available. Released 2021 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | - | - |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~288 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 | 6.1 inches, 89.8 cm2 |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.4 GHz | Quad-core 1.4 GHz |
| Chipset | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) | Unisoc SC9832E (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
| OS | Android 11 (Go edition) | Android 10 (Go edition) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC |
| Internal | 32GB 2GB RAM | 32GB 2GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 2 MP | 5 MP (wide)
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 0.3 MP | 5 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | GPS |
| Radio | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| USB | microUSB | microUSB |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Type | 3020 mAh | 3000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Sky Cyan, Sky Black, Ocean Blue | Black, Purple, Green |
itel A23S
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Lightweight and portable
- Limited performance for multitasking
- Likely basic camera quality
- Potential for slow software updates
itel A48
- Potentially better software optimization
- Slightly larger battery capacity (likely)
- Improved user experience (potentially)
- May be slightly more expensive
- Still limited by the Unisoc SC9832E chipset
- Camera performance still basic
Display Comparison
Both the itel A23S and A48 likely feature similar LCD panels, given their price bracket. Without specific display specs like resolution or brightness, it's difficult to differentiate. However, the A48 may benefit from software calibration for slightly improved color accuracy. Expect both displays to be adequate for basic tasks but lacking in vibrancy and viewing angles compared to higher-end panels. The 28nm chipset will likely limit the ability to drive a high-resolution display efficiently, making the likely lower resolution a practical choice for battery life.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance on both devices will be limited by the chipset's image signal processor (ISP) and sensor quality. While specifications aren't provided, it's reasonable to assume both phones feature basic camera setups. Any differences in image quality will likely stem from software processing rather than hardware. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, as the low resolution will result in limited detail. Focusing on the main sensor's megapixel count and aperture (if available) will be more indicative of real-world image quality.
Performance
The core of both devices is the Unisoc SC9832E chipset, featuring a quad-core CPU clocked at 1.4 GHz. This chipset is designed for entry-level tasks like calling, texting, and light social media browsing. Performance will be similar on both phones, with noticeable lag when multitasking or running demanding applications. The 28nm manufacturing process is relatively inefficient, meaning thermal throttling could become a factor during sustained use, impacting consistent performance. RAM capacity, which is not specified, will be a key determinant of multitasking capability; more RAM will mitigate slowdowns.
Battery Life
Battery life is a critical factor in this segment. While the exact battery capacity of each device isn't specified, the A48 likely has a slightly larger battery. The power-efficient nature of the Unisoc SC9832E and the likely lower resolution display will contribute to all-day battery life with moderate usage. Charging wattage is also unspecified, but both phones will likely support slow charging speeds, meaning a full charge will take several hours. The A48's potential for slightly larger capacity and software optimization could translate to a few extra hours of usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the itel A23S if you need a functional smartphone for the absolute lowest possible price and are comfortable with minimal performance expectations. It's ideal for first-time smartphone users or as a temporary device. Buy the itel A48 if you prefer a slightly more refined experience, potentially benefiting from software updates and a marginally longer battery life, even if it means spending a little more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Unisoc SC9832E chipset struggle with popular apps like WhatsApp and Facebook?
While the Unisoc SC9832E can run apps like WhatsApp and Facebook, expect some lag and slowdowns, especially when multitasking. These apps are relatively lightweight, but the chipset's limited processing power will become apparent with heavier usage or multiple apps open simultaneously.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the itel A23S or A48?
Given the likely slow charging wattage, expect a full charge to take between 3-5 hours. It's best to charge the phones overnight to ensure they are fully powered for the next day.
❓ Can either of these phones play PUBG Mobile or other demanding games?
Playing PUBG Mobile or similar demanding games on either the itel A23S or A48 is not recommended. The Unisoc SC9832E chipset lacks the processing power and graphics capabilities to deliver a playable experience. You may be able to run less demanding 2D games, but expect limited performance.
❓ What is the expected software update support for these devices?
Software update support for these ultra-budget devices is typically limited. Expect minimal updates, primarily focused on security patches. Major Android version updates are unlikely.
