Intex targeted the ultra-budget segment with both the Aqua Star L and Aqua Power. While both devices share a similar price point and target first-time smartphone users, a key difference lies under the hood: the Aqua Power boasts an octa-core processor compared to the Aqua Star L’s quad-core chip. This comparison dissects the real-world implications of this core count difference, and other specs, to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing multitasking and smoother app performance, the Intex Aqua Power is the clear winner. Its octa-core MT6592M processor provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Aqua Star L’s quad-core MT6582M, making it better suited for running multiple apps and handling slightly more demanding tasks. However, the Star L remains a viable option for basic use.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 900 / 1800 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 2100 | HSDPA 2100 |
| Speed | HSPA | HSPA |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA | GSM / HSPA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, January. Released 2015, January | 2014, November. Released 2014, November |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 141 x 72.9 x 8 mm (5.55 x 2.87 x 0.31 in) | 141 x 71.9 x 9.3 mm (5.55 x 2.83 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| Weight | 130 g (4.59 oz) | 160 g (5.64 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) | 480 x 854 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~196 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~67.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~68.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 | Octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6582M (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6592M (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-400MP2 | Mali-450MP4 |
| OS | Android 5.0 (Lollipop) | Android 4.4.2 (KitKat) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC |
| Internal | 8GB 1GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 8 MP, AF | 8 MP |
| Video | Yes | Yes |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 2 MP | 2 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 220 h | Up to 500 h |
| Talk time | Up to 5 h | Up to 11 h |
| Type | Li-Ion 2000 mAh, removable | Li-Ion 4000 mAh battery |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, black | White, black, blue, gray |
| SAR | 0.72 W/kg (head) | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
Intex Aqua Star L
- Potentially slightly better battery life due to less powerful processor.
- Lower price point (likely).
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks.
- Significantly slower performance compared to the Aqua Power.
- Struggles with multitasking.
- Limited gaming capabilities.
Intex Aqua Power
- Faster and smoother performance thanks to the octa-core processor.
- Improved multitasking capabilities.
- Better gaming experience (for less demanding titles).
- Potentially slightly shorter battery life.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Still limited by the Cortex-A7 architecture.
Display Comparison
Neither Intex provides display specifications beyond size, so a detailed comparison is limited. Both devices likely utilize IPS LCD panels, common in this price bracket. Given the similar target market, we can assume comparable brightness levels and color accuracy, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over display fidelity. Bezels are likely substantial on both models, reflecting their budget nature.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are unavailable. Given the price point, both devices likely feature basic camera sensors. It's reasonable to assume both phones have a primary rear camera and a front-facing camera for video calls. Image quality will likely be adequate for casual snapshots in good lighting conditions, but expect limited performance in low-light scenarios. The absence of detailed specs suggests neither device prioritizes camera capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset: the Aqua Star L uses the Mediatek MT6582M with a quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU, while the Aqua Power features the MT6592M with an octa-core 1.4 GHz Cortex-A7 CPU. While both are based on the Cortex-A7 architecture and manufactured on a 28nm process, the Aqua Power’s eight cores offer significantly improved multitasking capabilities. The MT6592M can handle more concurrent processes without noticeable slowdown, making app switching and web browsing smoother. While neither chipset is a gaming powerhouse, the Aqua Power will provide a more playable experience in less demanding titles. The 28nm process node suggests similar thermal characteristics, meaning neither device is likely to suffer from severe overheating under moderate use.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. However, considering the similar form factors and target market, battery life is likely comparable. The MT6592M in the Aqua Power, while more powerful, also consumes more energy. Therefore, any battery life advantage gained from the more efficient processor is likely offset by the increased power draw. Charging wattage is also unknown, suggesting both devices utilize standard, relatively slow charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Intex Aqua Star L if you need a truly basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light app usage, and are on the absolute tightest budget. Its quad-core processor is sufficient for these tasks. Buy the Intex Aqua Power if you prefer a more responsive experience, frequently switch between apps, or occasionally engage in light gaming. The octa-core processor provides a significant performance boost for a minimal price increase.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Intex Aqua Power handle popular games like PUBG Mobile?
While the MT6592M is an octa-core processor, it's still based on the older Cortex-A7 architecture. PUBG Mobile is likely playable at the lowest settings with reduced frame rates. Expect significant lag and stuttering, especially in intense moments. It's not designed for demanding gaming.
❓ Is the difference between quad-core and octa-core noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the difference is noticeable, particularly when multitasking. The Aqua Power’s octa-core processor allows for smoother app switching and running multiple apps simultaneously without significant slowdown. The Aqua Star L will struggle with more than a few apps open at once.
❓ Which phone is better for someone who primarily uses WhatsApp and Facebook?
Both phones will handle WhatsApp and Facebook adequately. However, the Aqua Power will provide a more responsive experience, especially when loading images and videos within these apps. The extra cores contribute to a smoother overall user experience.
