The Intex Aqua 4G+ and Panasonic P77 represent a segment of the market where value is paramount. Both devices leverage Mediatek's MT6735 series chipset, but subtle differences in clock speed and potentially other configurations can impact user experience. This comparison dissects these nuances to determine which phone delivers the most for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing responsiveness in basic tasks, the Intex Aqua 4G+ edges out the Panasonic P77. Its slightly higher CPU clock speed of 1.3 GHz versus the P77’s 1.0 GHz translates to a snappier feel when navigating the interface and launching apps, despite both using the same Mediatek MT6735 chipset.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 40, 41 | 3, 5, 40 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2015, June. Released 2015, June | 2016, September. Released 2016, September |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 140 x 71 x 9.5 mm (5.51 x 2.80 x 0.37 in) | 143 x 72 x 7.6 mm (5.63 x 2.83 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Dual SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM |
| Weight | 136.5 g (4.83 oz) | 126 g (4.44 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) | 720 x 1280 pixels, 16:9 ratio (~294 ppi density) |
| Size | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~69.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 5.0 inches, 68.9 cm2 (~66.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 | Quad-core 1.0 GHz Cortex-A53 |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6735 (28 nm) | Mediatek MT6735P (28 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-T720MP2 | Mali-T720MP2 |
| OS | Android 5.0 (Lollipop) | Android 5.1 (Lollipop) |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDHC | microSDHC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 16GB 2GB RAM | 8GB 1GB RAM, 16GB 1GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP, AF | 8 MP, AF |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 5 MP | 2 MP |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP | 4.0, A2DP |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0 | microUSB 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, hotspot | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct, hotspot |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer, proximity | Accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Stand-by | Up to 210 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 8 h | - |
| Type | Li-Ion 2300 mAh, non-removable | Li-Po 2000 mAh, removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | White, Black | White, Gray |
| Price | - | About 100 EUR |
| SAR EU | 0.26 W/kg (head) | - |
Intex Aqua 4G+
- Slightly faster CPU clock speed (1.3 GHz)
- Potentially more responsive user interface
- Likely better performance in basic tasks
- Brand reputation is less established than Panasonic
- Unknown RAM capacity could limit performance
Panasonic P77
- Panasonic is a more recognizable brand
- Potential for software optimizations
- Potentially slightly better battery life due to lower CPU clock
- Slower CPU clock speed (1.0 GHz)
- Likely less responsive user interface
- May struggle more with multitasking
Display Comparison
Neither Intex nor Panasonic provide display specifications beyond the basic screen size. Given the target market, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. Without knowing resolution or brightness levels, it's difficult to assess visual quality. However, the absence of features like high refresh rates or HDR support is a given at this price point. The user experience will likely be similar, focusing on basic readability rather than immersive visuals.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are sparse for both devices. It’s safe to assume both feature basic camera setups geared towards casual photography. Without knowing sensor sizes, apertures, or image processing algorithms, a direct comparison is impossible. The presence of a 2MP or 5MP secondary camera on either device is unlikely to significantly impact image quality; these are typically included for marketing purposes rather than genuine photographic utility. Expect adequate performance in well-lit conditions, but poor results in low light.
Performance
The core of both phones is the Mediatek MT6735 chipset, fabricated on a 28nm process. However, the Intex Aqua 4G+ boasts a quad-core Cortex-A53 CPU clocked at 1.3 GHz, while the Panasonic P77’s CPU is clocked at 1.0 GHz. This 30% clock speed difference, while not massive, will result in faster processing of instructions. The MT6735P in the Panasonic P77 *may* include minor optimizations, but these are unlikely to overcome the clock speed deficit. Both phones will struggle with demanding games or heavy multitasking, but the Intex will likely handle them slightly better. RAM capacity, which is not specified, will also play a crucial role; more RAM will mitigate the limitations of the chipset.
Battery Life
Battery capacity is not specified for either device. Given the budget nature of these phones, expect capacities in the 2000-2500 mAh range. Charging wattage is also unknown. Real-world battery life will depend heavily on usage patterns, but both phones will likely require daily charging. The slightly more efficient CPU in the Panasonic P77 *might* translate to marginally longer battery life, but the difference will likely be minimal.
Buying Guide
Buy the Intex Aqua 4G+ if you need a phone that feels a bit more responsive for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light app usage. Its higher CPU clock speed provides a marginal, but noticeable, performance boost. Buy the Panasonic P77 if you prioritize potential software optimizations or brand preference, understanding that the core performance will be slightly slower due to the lower clocked CPU.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Panasonic P77 be noticeably slower than the Intex Aqua 4G+ in everyday use?
While the difference isn't massive, the 30% CPU clock speed advantage of the Intex Aqua 4G+ will result in a slightly snappier experience when launching apps, browsing the web, and navigating the user interface. Users accustomed to faster phones will likely notice the difference more.
❓ Does the MT6735P chipset in the Panasonic P77 offer any significant advantages over the standard MT6735 in the Intex Aqua 4G+?
The 'P' designation in MT6735P typically indicates minor optimizations, potentially related to power efficiency or modem performance. However, these optimizations are unlikely to overcome the performance deficit caused by the lower CPU clock speed in the Panasonic P77. The core architecture and capabilities remain largely the same.
❓ Can either of these phones handle popular games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile?
Both the Intex Aqua 4G+ and Panasonic P77 will struggle with demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Call of Duty Mobile. You'll likely need to play at the lowest graphics settings and frame rates to achieve playable performance, and even then, expect occasional lag and stuttering. These phones are not designed for gaming.
