The sub-$300 smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Infinix Zero X and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this, particularly in chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a more efficient processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Infinix Zero X’s 45W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a more modern and power-efficient architecture despite a slightly lower clock speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.7 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, 5x optical zoom, OIS
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | - | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Infinix Zero X
- Potentially smoother performance in light tasks due to higher CPU clock speeds.
- May offer a more affordable price point.
- Sleek design (based on brand aesthetic).
- Less efficient 12nm chipset leads to higher power consumption.
- Slower 45W charging.
- Lacks 5G connectivity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0 and QC3 support.
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695 processor.
- 5G connectivity for future-proofed data speeds.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Software bloatware (typical of Xiaomi).
- Potentially less optimized gaming performance compared to dedicated gaming phones.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a top-tier display, but details are lacking for the Infinix Zero X. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) likely features an AMOLED panel, common for Xiaomi’s ‘Pro’ series, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks. The absence of refresh rate information for the Zero X puts it at a disadvantage, as the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is expected to have a 120Hz panel, resulting in smoother scrolling and animations. Bezels are likely comparable, given the price bracket, but the Redmi’s panel technology gives it an edge.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Infinix Zero X, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is known for its 108MP main sensor, offering detailed images in good lighting conditions. The aperture size and OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) are crucial factors, and the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) likely incorporates these features for improved low-light performance and stable video recording. The Zero X’s camera system is likely to be less sophisticated, potentially relying more on software processing to compensate for hardware limitations. The inclusion of a 2MP macro lens on both devices is largely a marketing gimmick, offering limited practical benefit.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G, fabricated on a 6nm process. This translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management compared to the Infinix Zero X’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). While the Helio G95’s Cortex-A76 cores clock slightly higher (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Snapdragon), the Snapdragon 695’s newer architecture and smaller node provide a more consistent performance profile, especially under sustained load. The Snapdragon 695 also unlocks 5G connectivity, a feature absent in the Zero X. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) will likely benefit from more optimized software support from Xiaomi, further enhancing its performance.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)’s 67W charging is a significant advantage. It can reach 50% charge in 15 minutes and fully charge in 42 minutes, minimizing downtime. The Infinix Zero X’s 45W charging, while respectable, is noticeably slower, reaching 40% in 15 minutes. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Snapdragon 695’s superior efficiency means the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) will likely offer comparable or better battery life despite potentially having a similar capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero X if you prioritize a potentially smoother experience in less demanding tasks and are comfortable with slightly slower charging speeds. Its Helio G95 chipset is capable for everyday use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value faster charging, 5G connectivity, and a more efficient processor for sustained performance, making it ideal for gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship gaming chip, it's capable of running PUBG and Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. The 6nm process and improved thermal management help prevent significant throttling during extended gaming sessions, offering a more consistent experience than the Helio G95.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) compared to the 45W charging on the Infinix Zero X in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) provides a substantial time saving. You can expect a full charge in approximately 42 minutes, whereas the Infinix Zero X will take considerably longer. This difference is particularly noticeable for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) actually useful in India right now?
5G rollout in India is ongoing, but coverage is expanding rapidly in major cities. While not universally available yet, investing in a 5G-enabled phone like the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) future-proofs your device and allows you to take advantage of faster speeds as 5G infrastructure becomes more widespread.
