The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Infinix Zero X, with its focus on fast charging and aggressive pricing, challenges the established Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G, a device known for its balanced feature set and reliable performance. This comparison dissects both phones to determine which offers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset provides a noticeable performance advantage, particularly in sustained workloads, and its well-rounded feature set offers a more polished experience. However, the Infinix Zero X’s 45W charging is a compelling advantage for those prioritizing speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.7 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, 5x optical zoom, OIS
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 320 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero X
- Significantly faster 45W charging
- Potentially more aggressive pricing
- Competitive battery endurance
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G95)
- Potentially less refined software experience
- Limited display brightness information
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 778G chipset
- Brighter and likely more color-accurate display
- Reliable Samsung software and support
- Slower 25W charging
- Potentially higher price point
- Similar battery endurance to the Zero X
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 800 nits, compared to an unstated value for the Infinix Zero X. This translates to better visibility outdoors. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio suggests deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The A52s 5G’s display is likely to offer a more pleasant viewing experience in bright conditions, and potentially better color accuracy, though specific calibration data for the Zero X is unavailable.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but details beyond this are limited. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more consistent and pleasing results. Sensor size and aperture data are crucial here, but absent for the Zero X. Without this information, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance. The A52s 5G’s image stabilization (OIS) is a significant advantage for video recording, reducing shake and improving clarity. We can assume the A52s 5G will offer a more refined camera experience overall.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is built on a more efficient process node than the Infinix Zero X’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). This 6nm process allows for higher performance at lower temperatures, reducing thermal throttling during demanding tasks. The Snapdragon 778G’s CPU configuration – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – is architecturally superior to the Zero X’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 setup, resulting in faster single-core and multi-core performance. The A52s 5G will handle graphically intensive games and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
Both devices share an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life despite the Infinix Zero X’s charging advantage. However, the Zero X’s 45W wired charging significantly outperforms the A52s 5G’s 25W charging. The Zero X can achieve a 40% charge in just 15 minutes, a substantial benefit for users who need a quick power boost. While the A52s 5G’s battery life is comparable, the Zero X offers a faster path to a full charge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero X if you prioritize extremely fast charging and are comfortable with a potentially less refined software experience. It’s ideal for users who frequently top up their phones and need to minimize downtime. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you value consistent performance, a brighter and more color-accurate display, and the reliability of Samsung’s software and support. It’s the better option for gamers, photographers, and those seeking a long-term, dependable device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G95 in the Infinix Zero X struggle with sustained gaming performance?
The Helio G95 is a capable chipset, but its 12nm process node is less efficient than the Snapdragon 778G’s 6nm node. This means the Zero X is more likely to experience thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions, leading to reduced frame rates and performance over time. The A52s 5G will maintain higher, more consistent performance during prolonged gameplay.
❓ How much faster is the 45W charging on the Infinix Zero X compared to the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G?
The Infinix Zero X can achieve a 40% charge in just 15 minutes with its 45W charging. While a precise 0-100% time for the A52s 5G isn’t available, it will take considerably longer – likely exceeding 60 minutes – to fully charge. This makes the Zero X ideal for users who need a quick top-up before leaving the house.
❓ Is the camera on the Infinix Zero X a significant step down from the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G?
Without detailed sensor specifications for the Zero X, it’s difficult to say definitively. However, Samsung’s established camera expertise and likely inclusion of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A52s 5G suggest a more refined and versatile camera experience, particularly in low-light conditions and for video recording.
