Infinix Zero X vs Zero Ultra: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Infinix Zero Ultra is the clear winner, boasting a significantly faster chipset, a revolutionary 180W charging speed, and a generally more premium feel. However, the Zero X remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers seeking a solid all-around performer.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero X | Infinix Zero Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/75 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2022, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2022, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | - |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.7 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 165.5 x 74.5 x 8.8 mm - Coslight Silver165.5 x 75.1 x 9.2 mm - Genesis Noir |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 12, XOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, 5x optical zoom, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide), AF 2 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min | 180W wired, 100% in 12 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver | Coslight Silver, Genesis Noir |
| Models | - | X6820 |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 500 EUR |
Infinix Zero X
- More affordable
- Solid camera with OIS
- Good all-around performance for the price
- Decent battery life
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- IPS LCD display
- Less premium design
Infinix Zero Ultra
- Blazing-fast 180W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 920 chipset
- Vibrant AMOLED display
- Premium design
- Improved camera performance
- Higher price
- Potentially shorter software support lifespan (compared to more established brands)
Display Comparison
The Zero Ultra features a 6.8-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate and a higher resolution (likely FHD+ or higher) compared to the Zero X's likely FHD+ IPS LCD. Expect vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling on the Ultra. The Zero X's display is perfectly adequate but lacks the premium feel of the Ultra's AMOLED panel.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems. The Zero X is known for its 64MP primary sensor and OIS. The Zero Ultra likely boasts a higher resolution primary sensor (potentially 64MP or higher) and improved image processing capabilities thanks to its more powerful chipset. Expect better low-light performance and more detail from the Ultra.
Performance
The Dimensity 920 in the Zero Ultra offers a substantial performance advantage over the Helio G95 in the Zero X. Expect faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance on the Ultra. The Ultra's 6nm process also contributes to improved power efficiency.
Battery Life
While both phones likely have similar battery capacities (around 5000mAh), the Zero Ultra's 180W charging is a game-changer. It can charge from 0% to 100% in just 12 minutes, a feat unmatched by the Zero X's 45W charging.
Buying Guide
The Infinix Zero X is ideal for users prioritizing affordability and a balanced feature set. It's a great choice for everyday tasks, social media, and casual photography. The Infinix Zero Ultra is for power users, mobile gamers, and anyone who demands the fastest charging speeds and top-tier performance, and appreciates a more premium design.