Infinix continues to deliver impressive smartphones at competitive prices. The Zero X and Zero 5G are two popular contenders, each offering unique features. But which one is right for you? This comprehensive comparison will delve into every aspect, from display and performance to camera and battery life.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Infinix Zero 5G takes the lead thanks to its 5G connectivity, more efficient chipset, and slightly faster charging. However, the Zero X offers a compelling alternative with its faster charging speed and potentially better camera performance in certain scenarios, making it a strong value proposition.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - X6815 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - X6815 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - X6815B |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2022, February 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2022, March 03 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.7 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 168.7 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 199 g (7.05 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~388 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, XOS 10.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, 5x optical zoom, OIS
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom
2 MP |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min | 33W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver | Cosmic Black, Skylight Orange, Horizon Blue |
| Models | - | X6815, X6815B |
| Price | About 320 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 140h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1610:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 419083 (v8), 487639 (v9)
GeekBench: 2169 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero X
- Faster 45W Charging
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Competitive price
- Less efficient chipset
- No 5G connectivity
- Lower display brightness
Infinix Zero 5G
- 5G Connectivity
- More efficient Dimensity 900 chipset
- Brighter display
- Excellent battery life
- Slower 33W Charging
- Potentially slightly less impressive camera in some scenarios
- May be slightly more expensive
Display Comparison
Both phones boast impressive 1610:1 contrast ratios, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. However, the Zero 5G's measured 499 nits max brightness gives it a noticeable edge in outdoor visibility. The Zero X's display is still good, but not as bright. Screen sizes are likely similar, around 6.6 inches, with AMOLED panels on both.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but specifics are limited in the provided data. The Zero X is often praised for its image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The Zero 5G likely benefits from the Dimensity 900's image signal processor (ISP). Real-world testing would be needed to definitively declare a winner.
Performance
The Zero 5G's Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) chipset is significantly more efficient and powerful than the Zero X's Helio G95 (12nm). Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Zero 5G. The Zero X is still capable, but the Dimensity 900 offers a clear advantage.
Battery Life
The Zero 5G boasts an endurance rating of 140h, suggesting exceptional battery life. While the Zero X's battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), the more efficient chipset in the Zero 5G contributes to its superior longevity. The Zero X's 45W charging is faster than the Zero 5G's 33W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Infinix Zero X is ideal for users prioritizing fast charging and potentially a slightly better camera experience, especially if 5G isn't a necessity. The Infinix Zero 5G is the better choice for those wanting 5G connectivity, smoother performance thanks to the Dimensity 900, and a brighter display.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Infinix Zero 5G worth the extra cost?
If 5G connectivity and smoother performance are important to you, then yes. The Dimensity 900 chipset and brighter display justify the price difference.
❓ Which phone has better battery life?
The Infinix Zero 5G, with its endurance rating of 140h, offers significantly better battery life thanks to its more efficient chipset.
