The Xiaomi Poco F3 GT and Infinix Zero X Pro represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Poco F3 GT aggressively targets gamers with a flagship-level chipset, while the Infinix Zero X Pro aims for a more balanced experience, prioritizing battery life and a versatile camera system. This comparison dissects their strengths and weaknesses to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing gaming and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 1200 chipset delivers significantly superior performance. However, if all-day battery life and a more moderate price point are paramount, the Infinix Zero X Pro remains a viable option.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2021, July 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, July 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.7 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 161.9 x 76.9 x 8.3 mm (6.37 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | Physical pop-up gaming triggers
IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 5x optical zoom, OIS
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio
Tuned by JBL |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5065 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Tuscany Brown | Predator Black, Gunmetal Silver |
| Models | X6810, X6811, X6811B, MZ-Infinix X6811 | MZB09C6IN, M2104K10I |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 300 EUR |
| SAR | - | 0.81 W/kg (head) 0.48 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 119h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.3 LUFS (Average)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 313652 (v8), 363939 (v9)
GeekBench: 1674 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Infinix Zero X Pro
- Excellent battery endurance (119h rating)
- Relatively affordable price point
- Decent camera system for everyday use
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Poco F3 GT
- Slower charging speeds
Xiaomi Poco F3 GT
- Flagship-level Dimensity 1200 chipset
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- Optimized for gaming performance
- Potentially shorter battery life
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Infinix Zero X Pro features a display capable of 515 nits of peak brightness, adequate for indoor use but potentially washed out in direct sunlight. The Poco F3 GT’s display specifications are not provided, but given its gaming focus, it likely prioritizes refresh rate over peak brightness. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rate capabilities for optimal power efficiency. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and without color accuracy data, it’s difficult to assess which display offers more accurate color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are described as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, lacking specific details. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Poco F3 GT may prioritize video recording features geared towards gamers (e.g., high frame rate recording). The Infinix Zero X Pro likely focuses on providing a versatile camera experience for everyday photography. The absence of detail suggests neither phone features a particularly groundbreaking camera system, and any 2MP macro lenses are likely of limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F3 GT’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Zero X Pro’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm). The Dimensity 1200’s more advanced fabrication process and superior CPU architecture – featuring a Cortex-A78 prime core versus the G95’s Cortex-A76 – translate to significantly faster processing speeds and improved efficiency. The CPU configuration of the Poco F3 GT (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) is demonstrably more powerful than the Zero X Pro’s (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55). This difference will be most noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. While RAM specifications aren't provided, the Poco F3 GT likely benefits from faster LPDDR5 RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Infinix Zero X Pro boasts an endurance rating of 119 hours, indicating solid battery life. Its 45W charging allows for a 40% charge in 15 minutes. The Poco F3 GT, however, features a significantly faster 67W charging solution with PD3.0 and QC3 support, capable of a full charge in just 42 minutes. While the Poco F3 GT’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging suggests it may compensate for a potentially smaller battery size. The trade-off is clear: the Zero X Pro offers longer runtimes, while the F3 GT prioritizes minimizing downtime.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero X Pro if you need a phone that reliably lasts a full day on a single charge and offers a decent camera experience without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and those who occasionally game. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F3 GT if you prioritize raw gaming performance, demand the fastest possible charging speeds, and are willing to compromise slightly on battery endurance. This phone is built for mobile gamers and power users.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Poco F3 GT's Dimensity 1200 overheat during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 1200 is a powerful chip, and while it's efficient, sustained high loads can generate heat. The Poco F3 GT likely incorporates thermal management solutions, but prolonged gaming at maximum settings may still lead to some throttling. Monitoring temperatures during gameplay is recommended.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Infinix Zero X Pro fast enough for most users?
While 45W isn't the fastest charging available, it's still reasonably quick and can provide a significant charge in a short amount of time. The 40% charge in 15 minutes is sufficient for many users needing a quick top-up.
❓ Does the Helio G95 in the Infinix Zero X Pro struggle with demanding games?
The Helio G95 is a capable mid-range chipset, but it will struggle with the most graphically intensive games at maximum settings. Lowering graphics settings will be necessary for a smooth gaming experience.
❓ What type of user would benefit most from the Poco F3 GT's fast charging?
Gamers and power users who frequently drain their battery and need to quickly recharge will benefit the most. The 67W charging allows for minimal downtime between gaming sessions or demanding tasks.
