Xiaomi 11T Pro vs. Infinix Zero X Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 888 delivers significantly more processing power. However, the Infinix Zero X Pro offers respectable performance and a longer endurance rating at a potentially lower price point, making it a compelling value proposition.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero X Pro | Xiaomi 11T Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2021, September 15 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, October 05 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.7 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 164.1 x 76.9 x 8.8 mm (6.46 x 3.03 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | AMOLED, Dolby Vision, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Cortex-X1 & 3x2.42 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 660 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 5x optical zoom, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 108 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 5 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto macro), 1/5.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960, HDR10+, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | Tuned by Harman Kardon 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 72% in 10 min, 100% in 17 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Tuscany Brown | Meteorite Gray, Moonlight White, Celestial Blue |
| Models | X6810, X6811, X6811B, MZ-Infinix X6811 | 2107113SG, 2107113SI, 2107113SR |
| Price | About 180 EUR | € 139.00 / $ 185.21 / £ 189.99 / ₹ 39,999 |
| SAR | - | 0.78 W/kg (head) 0.49 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 119h | Endurance rating 92h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | -26.3 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 313652 (v8), 363939 (v9) GeekBench: 1674 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Infinix Zero X Pro
- Longer battery endurance (119h)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Respectable performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly less powerful chipset
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi 11T Pro
- Flagship-level Snapdragon 888 performance
- Much brighter and vibrant display
- Ultra-fast 120W charging
- Shorter battery endurance (92h)
- Potentially higher price
- May run hotter under sustained load
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s display is a standout feature, achieving a measured peak brightness of 837 nits, significantly exceeding the Infinix Zero X Pro’s 515 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both devices feature AMOLED panels, the Xiaomi’s higher brightness and infinite (nominal) contrast ratio provide a more vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The Zero X Pro’s lower brightness may be sufficient for indoor use, but it will struggle in brighter environments. We lack data on refresh rates, but the 11T Pro's positioning suggests a higher refresh rate is likely.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is missing. However, given the market positioning, the Xiaomi 11T Pro likely features a more sophisticated camera system. The Snapdragon 888’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is significantly more capable than the Helio G95’s, enabling better image processing, noise reduction, and dynamic range. While both phones likely offer standard features like HDR and night mode, the 11T Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of specific sensor details makes a definitive comparison difficult, but the chipset advantage heavily favors the Xiaomi.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi 11T Pro’s Snapdragon 888 (5nm) is a flagship-level processor, featuring a Cortex-X1 prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz, while the Infinix Zero X Pro utilizes the MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). The 5nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 888 offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance compared to the 12nm Helio G95. This means the 11T Pro can sustain peak performance for longer periods without significant throttling. The 11T Pro’s CPU configuration – 1x Cortex-X1, 3x Cortex-A78, and 4x Cortex-A55 – is architecturally more advanced than the Zero X Pro’s 2x Cortex-A76 & 6x Cortex-A55, resulting in noticeable gains in both single-core and multi-core performance.
Battery Life
The Infinix Zero X Pro boasts an endurance rating of 119 hours, while the Xiaomi 11T Pro achieves 92 hours. This suggests the Zero X Pro offers better overall battery life despite potentially having a smaller capacity battery. However, the Xiaomi 11T Pro compensates with its incredibly fast 120W charging, capable of reaching 72% charge in just 10 minutes and 100% in 17 minutes. The Zero X Pro’s 45W charging, while respectable, pales in comparison. The trade-off is clear: the Zero X Pro prioritizes longevity, while the 11T Pro prioritizes convenience and quick top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero X Pro if you need a phone that prioritizes battery life and offers a solid all-around experience without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for everyday users, social media enthusiasts, and those who occasionally game. Buy the Xiaomi 11T Pro if you demand top-tier performance for demanding games, video editing, or multitasking, and if you value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging.