Motorola Edge 20 Pro vs. Infinix Zero X Pro: Which Mid-Range Flagship Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 870 chipset provides a significant performance advantage over the Helio G95 in the Infinix Zero X Pro, translating to smoother multitasking and superior gaming capabilities. While the Infinix boasts respectable battery endurance, the Motorola’s brighter display and faster processor make it the more well-rounded choice.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero X Pro | Motorola Edge 20 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2021, July 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, September 17 | Available. Released 2021, August 16 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.1 x 75.7 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (6.81 oz) | 185/190 g (depending on color) (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) | OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 650 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 10 | Android 11, planned upgrade to Android 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | - |
| Triple | 108 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), 1/4.4", 1.0µm, PDAF, 5x optical zoom, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 126mm (periscope telephoto), 1.0µm, 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS 16 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1.0µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240/960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.4 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min | 30W wired |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Tuscany Brown | Midnight Blue, Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent Cloud |
| Models | X6810, X6811, X6811B, MZ-Infinix X6811 | XT2153-1 |
| Price | About 180 EUR | About 330 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 119h | Endurance rating 112h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -28.3 LUFS (Average) | -29.2 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 313652 (v8), 363939 (v9) GeekBench: 1674 (v5.1) GFXBench: 18fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 711090 (v9) GeekBench: 3140 (v5.1) GFXBench: 49fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero X Pro
- Longer battery endurance (119h)
- Faster charging speed (45W)
- Potentially lower price point
- Inferior chipset performance (Helio G95)
- Lower display brightness (515 nits)
- Limited camera details
Motorola Edge 20 Pro
- Superior chipset performance (Snapdragon 870)
- Brighter display (673 nits)
- More efficient processor
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (112h)
- Slower charging speed (30W)
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro’s display is a clear winner in terms of brightness, achieving a measured 673 nits compared to the Infinix Zero X Pro’s 515 nits. This translates to significantly better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both devices offer a 'Photo/Video' capability, the Motorola’s higher brightness enhances the viewing experience. The Edge 20 Pro also boasts an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks and more vibrant colors, though the Infinix’s contrast ratio is not specified. The lack of information on panel type for the Infinix makes it difficult to assess color accuracy, but the Motorola’s brighter panel is a tangible benefit for most users.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. Without specifics on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the Motorola’s superior processing power, it’s likely to offer more sophisticated image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of details on the Infinix’s camera system raises concerns about its overall quality, especially compared to Motorola’s typically well-regarded camera implementations. We can assume the Motorola will offer a more refined camera experience.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G (7nm), a proven performer known for its efficiency and power. Its octa-core configuration (1x3.2 GHz Kryo 585, 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 585, 4x1.80 GHz Kryo 585) delivers significantly higher CPU and GPU performance than the Infinix Zero X Pro’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). The G95, with its (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) configuration, is a capable mid-range chip, but it simply cannot compete with the 870’s processing prowess. The 7nm fabrication process of the Snapdragon 870 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. The Motorola will handle graphically intensive games and multitasking with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Infinix Zero X Pro boasts an endurance rating of 119 hours, slightly edging out the Motorola Edge 20 Pro’s 112 hours. However, this advantage is partially offset by the Motorola’s faster 30W charging, compared to the Infinix’s 45W. While 45W sounds faster, the difference in real-world charging speed is likely minimal, with the Infinix claiming 40% charge in 15 minutes. The Snapdragon 870’s efficiency also plays a role; it may consume less power during typical usage, partially mitigating the Infinix’s larger battery capacity. The Motorola’s faster processor will draw more power under load, but the difference in endurance is unlikely to be significant for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero X Pro if you prioritize battery life and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and casual photography. Its 119-hour endurance rating is a definite plus for users who dislike frequent charging. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Pro if you demand strong performance for gaming, demanding applications, or frequent multitasking, and value a brighter, more vibrant display. The Snapdragon 870 offers a noticeable step up in processing power.