The mid-range 5G smartphone market is fiercely competitive. The Infinix Zero X Neo aims to undercut established players with a focus on value, while the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G offers a more refined experience backed by a stronger brand reputation. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G is the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 778G chipset delivers significantly better performance and efficiency, coupled with a brighter display and a more polished software experience. While the Zero X Neo offers a lower price point, the A52s 5G provides a more compelling overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 02 | Available. Released 2021, September 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.4 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.63 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 159.9 x 75.1 x 8.4 mm (6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual Proximity Sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Ion 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Bahamas Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome White, Awesome Purple, Awesome Mint |
| Models | - | SM-A528B, SM-A528B/DS, SM-A528N |
| Price | About 210 EUR | £ 112.98 / € 249.47 |
| SAR | - | 0.72 W/kg (head) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.88 W/kg (head) 0.84 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-27.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 429675 (v8), 506432(v9)
GeekBench: 11060 (v4.4), 2801 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero X Neo
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- 5G connectivity
- Less powerful chipset compared to the A52s 5G
- Slower charging speed
- Unspecified display quality
Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 778G
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster 25W charging
- Higher price tag
- May not be significantly better for very basic users
- Software updates may be less frequent than some competitors
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 800 nits, compared to the Infinix Zero X Neo’s unspecified brightness. This translates to better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels (based on market segment), the A52s 5G’s higher peak brightness and 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggest a more visually immersive experience. The lack of detailed display specs for the Zero X Neo leaves questions about color accuracy and viewing angles unanswered.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Zero X Neo. The A52s 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s image processing expertise, potentially delivering more consistent and refined images. Without knowing the main sensor size or aperture of the Zero X Neo, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The A52s 5G’s camera system, while not specified in detail here, typically includes features like Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) which the Zero X Neo likely lacks, resulting in sharper photos and smoother videos.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G (6nm) is a significant step up from the Infinix Zero X Neo’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm). The 778G features a more modern CPU architecture – a 1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core alongside 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores – versus the Zero X Neo’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 configuration. The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 778G also provides superior power efficiency, leading to less thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the A52s 5G will maintain higher performance for longer periods, particularly in gaming.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable battery life under similar usage scenarios. However, the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G’s 25W wired charging is significantly faster than the Infinix Zero X Neo’s 18W charging. This means the A52s 5G can replenish its battery more quickly, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the Snapdragon 778G’s superior efficiency may contribute to similar real-world battery life despite potentially having a smaller battery cell.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero X Neo if you prioritize absolute affordability and are willing to compromise on performance and software refinement. It's a solid option for basic smartphone tasks and casual gaming. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G if you demand smoother performance for demanding apps and games, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more reliable software experience with longer-term support. It's the better choice for power users and those seeking a phone that will last.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G95 in the Infinix Zero X Neo struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Helio G95 is a mid-range chipset and will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. The Snapdragon 778G in the A52s 5G offers a much smoother gaming experience with higher and more consistent frame rates.
❓ How much faster is the 25W charging on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Infinix Zero X Neo?
While exact charging times depend on various factors, the 25W charging on the A52s 5G will significantly reduce charging time. Expect a 0-100% charge to take approximately 60-75 minutes on the A52s 5G, compared to potentially 90-120 minutes on the Zero X Neo.
❓ Is the camera on the Samsung Galaxy A52s 5G noticeably better for low-light photography?
Based on Samsung's camera expertise and the likely inclusion of features like OIS, the A52s 5G is expected to perform better in low-light conditions. It should capture brighter, sharper images with less noise compared to the Zero X Neo, assuming similar sensor sizes.
