OnePlus Nord 2 5G vs. Infinix Zero X Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the OnePlus Nord 2 5G is the superior choice. Its significantly more powerful Dimensity 1200 chipset, coupled with 65W SuperVOOC charging, provides a smoother, faster, and more convenient experience. While the Zero X Neo offers respectable gaming capabilities, it can't match the Nord 2 5G's overall performance and feature set.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero X Neo | OnePlus Nord 2 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1800 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - EU |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA - EU |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2021, July 22 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 02 | Available. Released 2021, July 28 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.4 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.63 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 159.1 x 73.3 x 8.3 mm (6.26 x 2.89 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Fluid AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, OxygenOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Auto HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, SBAS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, PD, 100% in 30 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Bahamas Blue | Gray Sierra, Blue Haze, Green Wood, Pac-Man Edition |
| Models | - | DN2101, DN2103 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | € 189.00 / $ 219.99 / £ 148.00 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 102h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 512164 (v8) | 598022 (v9) GeekBench: 2792 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero X Neo
- Excellent gaming performance with the Helio G95.
- Sleek design and build quality.
- Competitive price point.
- Slow 18W charging.
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Nord 2 5G.
- Limited information on camera specifications.
OnePlus Nord 2 5G
- Flagship-level performance with the Dimensity 1200.
- Blazing-fast 65W SuperVOOC charging.
- Bright and vibrant display.
- Potentially higher price tag.
- Software experience may not appeal to all users.
- No expandable storage (likely).
Display Comparison
The OnePlus Nord 2 5G boasts a display capable of reaching 633 nits of peak brightness, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Zero X Neo’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be lower, impacting outdoor usability. Both devices feature an 'infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, typical of AMOLED panels, delivering deep blacks and vibrant colors. The Nord 2 5G’s brightness advantage is crucial for users who frequently consume content outdoors or in brightly lit environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Zero X Neo. The Nord 2 5G likely benefits from OnePlus’s established image processing algorithms. Without specific details on the Zero X Neo’s camera hardware, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, the Nord 2 5G’s likely superior image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 1200 chipset will contribute to better image quality and faster processing times. The absence of details on OIS or sensor size for the Zero X Neo suggests it may struggle in low-light conditions compared to a more sophisticated setup.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 1200 (6nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Infinix Zero X Neo’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm). The Dimensity 1200’s Cortex-A78 prime core clocked at 3.0 GHz, alongside its three additional A78 cores, provides significantly higher single-core and multi-core performance. The G95, with its two Cortex-A76 cores at 2.05 GHz, is geared towards gaming but falls behind in overall system responsiveness. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 1200 also translates to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Nord 2 5G will handle demanding apps and multitasking with ease, while the Zero X Neo may show signs of strain.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 102 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the lack of specific mAh ratings for the Zero X Neo. However, the charging experience is drastically different. The OnePlus Nord 2 5G’s 65W SuperVOOC charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 30 minutes, a massive convenience. The Infinix Zero X Neo’s 18W charging is considerably slower, requiring significantly more time to fully charge, impacting usability for users who need a quick power boost.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero X Neo if you prioritize gaming on a budget and are willing to compromise on charging speed and overall system performance. It’s a good fit for casual gamers and users who don’t demand the absolute fastest processing. Buy the OnePlus Nord 2 5G if you value a consistently smooth experience, rapid charging, and a more refined software experience. It’s ideal for power users, content creators, and anyone who wants a phone that can handle demanding tasks without breaking a sweat.