Motorola Edge 20 Fusion vs. Infinix Zero X Neo: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion is the superior choice. Its Dimensity 800U chipset, built on a more efficient 7nm process, provides a noticeable advantage in demanding tasks and offers a more future-proof experience. The 30W charging also significantly reduces downtime.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero X Neo | Motorola Edge 20 Fusion |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 66 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2021, August 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 02 | Available. Released 2021, August 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front |
| Dimensions | 168.4 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.63 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 166 x 76 x 8.3 mm (6.54 x 2.99 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 185 g (6.53 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent design | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+ |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G57 MC3 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 2.2 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF 8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.3, (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 30W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Bahamas Blue | Electric Graphite, Cyber Teal |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 250 EUR |
Infinix Zero X Neo
- Potentially lower price point
- Adequate performance for basic tasks
- Acceptable camera performance for casual users
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G95)
- Slower charging (18W)
- Likely less efficient power consumption
Motorola Edge 20 Fusion
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 800U)
- Faster charging (30W)
- Better power efficiency
- Smoother multitasking and gaming
- Potentially higher price
- May not offer significant camera improvements over the Zero X Neo
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a standout display. While specific panel details (like OLED vs IPS) are missing, the focus here is on processing power. Display quality will likely be similar, leaning towards adequate for the price point. Bezels are expected to be moderate on both, and color accuracy will likely be tuned for vibrant, rather than accurate, reproduction. The lack of high refresh rates on either device suggests a focus on battery life over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information beyond the presence of a main camera, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion is likely to benefit from Mediatek’s image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 800U, potentially offering better image processing capabilities. The Zero X Neo’s Helio G95 ISP is adequate, but less sophisticated. The absence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on either device suggests a reliance on software stabilization, which can introduce artifacts in low-light conditions. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and fixed focus.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s Mediatek Dimensity 800U (7nm) significantly outperforms the Infinix Zero X Neo’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm). The 7nm process inherently offers better power efficiency, translating to less heat generation and sustained performance. The Dimensity 800U’s CPU, with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores, also has a clock speed advantage over the Zero X Neo’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This means faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive user experience on the Fusion, particularly noticeable in graphically demanding games. While both use the same Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the Dimensity 800U’s superior architecture provides a clear edge.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified, but the charging wattage reveals a significant difference. The Motorola Edge 20 Fusion’s 30W wired charging is considerably faster than the Infinix Zero X Neo’s 18W charging. This translates to a much quicker 0-100% charge time, reducing downtime. While a larger battery capacity on the Zero X Neo could partially offset the slower charging, the Fusion’s faster charging is a more tangible benefit for users who frequently need to top up their battery throughout the day. The Dimensity 800U’s 7nm efficiency also contributes to better battery life during usage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero X Neo if you prioritize a lower initial cost and are primarily focused on everyday tasks like social media, browsing, and light gaming. It's a solid option for budget-conscious users. Buy the Motorola Edge 20 Fusion if you value smoother multitasking, better gaming performance, and faster charging speeds. It’s ideal for users who frequently stream video, play graphically intensive games, or need a phone that can keep up with a demanding workload.