The Infinix Zero X series offers compelling options in the budget smartphone market. But with the Zero X Neo and Zero X sharing a similar chipset, what truly sets them apart? This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best fits your needs and budget.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Infinix Zero X takes a clear lead thanks to its significantly faster 45W charging. While both phones share the same Helio G95 chipset, the Zero X's charging speed makes it a more practical choice for users who value quick top-ups. The Neo is a solid option if charging isn't a priority.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, September 13 | 2021, September 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 02 | Available. Released 2021, September 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.4 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.63 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 164.1 x 75.7 x 7.8 mm (6.46 x 2.98 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.2 cm2 (~84.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, XOS 7.6 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 25mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/3.4, 125mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, 5x optical zoom, OIS
8 MP, f/2.3, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Black, Starry Silver, Bahamas Blue | Nebula Black, Starry Silver |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 320 EUR |
Infinix Zero X Neo
- More affordable
- Solid performance with Helio G95
- Good display (likely AMOLED)
- Decent camera
- Slower 18W charging
- Potentially less advanced camera features
- May have slightly less RAM/storage options
Infinix Zero X
- Faster 45W charging
- Potentially better camera system
- Likely slightly better software optimization
- Premium feel (potentially better build quality)
- More expensive
- Similar chipset performance to Neo
- May not offer significant performance gains over Neo for most users
Display Comparison
Both phones likely feature similar AMOLED displays, potentially around 6.8 inches with a 90Hz refresh rate. Expect vibrant colors and good viewing angles. Differences might lie in brightness levels or screen protection (e.g., Gorilla Glass version). We'll need to confirm exact specs for a definitive comparison.
Camera Comparison
The Zero X series is known for its camera capabilities. While both likely have a 64MP main sensor, the Zero X might boast a more advanced triple-camera setup with improved image processing algorithms and potentially a higher-resolution ultrawide or telephoto lens. Expect the Zero X to offer slightly better image quality, especially in low light.
Performance
Sharing the same Helio G95 chipset and octa-core CPU, both phones should offer similar performance for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, software optimization could play a role in real-world responsiveness. RAM and storage configurations might differ, impacting multitasking capabilities.
Battery Life
The Zero X's 45W charging is the standout feature here. The Neo's 18W charging will take considerably longer to fully charge the battery. Battery capacity is likely similar (around 5000mAh), so the Zero X's charging speed provides a significant advantage.
Buying Guide
The Infinix Zero X Neo is ideal for users on a tighter budget who prioritize core performance and don't mind slower charging. The Infinix Zero X is a better choice for those who want faster charging and are willing to spend a bit more for the convenience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Helio G95 chipset good for gaming?
The Helio G95 is a capable chipset for moderate gaming. You can expect to play most games at medium to high settings, but demanding titles might require lower settings for smooth performance.
❓ What is the battery capacity of these phones?
Both phones likely have a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life under typical usage.
