Infinix Zero Ultra vs Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro: A Deep Dive into Speed and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and a well-rounded experience, the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset offers superior processing power and thermal management, while the 99-hour endurance rating provides peace of mind. However, the Infinix Zero Ultra’s 180W charging is a game-changer for those who absolutely need the fastest possible top-ups.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero Ultra | Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 2, 3, 5, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/75 Mbps, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, October 05 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, October 25 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 165.5 x 74.5 x 8.8 mm - Coslight Silver165.5 x 75.1 x 9.2 mm - Genesis Noir | 162.8 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm (6.41 x 2.97 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 213 g (7.51 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~526 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 900 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (HBM), 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.5 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 12, XOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide), AF 2 MP | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes (market/region dependent) | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 180W wired, 100% in 12 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3+, 50% in 15 min 30W wireless, 50% in 32 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Coslight Silver, Genesis Noir | Black, White |
| Models | X6820 | 23013PC75G |
| Price | About 500 EUR | $ 449.99 / € 241.85 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.00 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 99h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -26.2 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1057977 (v9) GeekBench: 4001 (v5.1), 4009 (v6) GFXBench: 50fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero Ultra
- Blazing-fast 180W charging
- Potentially competitive price point
- Modern design aesthetic (based on marketing materials)
- Dimensity 920 chipset is a generation behind
- Limited battery endurance information
- Camera specifications are currently unknown
Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro
- Powerful Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 processor
- Excellent 99-hour battery endurance
- Bright and vibrant display (1059 nits)
- 67W charging is slower than the Zero Ultra’s 180W
- Wireless charging may not be as fast as some competitors
- Software experience can be divisive (MIUI)
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 Pro boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1059 nits, which translates to better visibility under direct sunlight compared to the Infinix Zero Ultra (brightness data unavailable). While both offer an 'infinite' contrast ratio, the real-world difference will likely come down to color accuracy and panel calibration, data for which is currently unavailable for the Zero Ultra. The Poco F5 Pro’s display is likely to offer a more vibrant and accurate viewing experience, especially for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Infinix Zero Ultra. The Poco F5 Pro likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) and potentially a larger main sensor (specifications unavailable). Without specific details on the Zero Ultra’s camera hardware, it’s difficult to assess its image quality relative to the Poco F5 Pro. We can assume the Poco F5 Pro will offer more consistent and refined image processing, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The presence of OIS on the Poco F5 Pro is also a significant advantage for video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Poco F5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, fabricated on a 4nm process, demonstrably outperforms the Infinix Zero Ultra’s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1’s Cortex-X2 prime core (3.0 GHz) and more efficient architecture provide a significant advantage in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The Dimensity 920, while capable, is positioned a generation behind. The Poco F5 Pro’s LPDDR5X RAM further enhances performance, offering faster data transfer rates. Thermal management is also a key consideration; the 4nm process of the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 generally results in lower temperatures and less throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Poco F5 Pro achieves a remarkable 99-hour endurance rating, suggesting excellent battery life despite its 67W charging. While the Infinix Zero Ultra’s 180W charging is undeniably faster – reaching 100% in just 12 minutes – the Poco F5 Pro’s 67W charging still manages 50% in 15 minutes. The Zero Ultra’s focus is on speed, while the Poco F5 Pro prioritizes longevity. The Poco F5 Pro also offers 30W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Zero Ultra, adding to its versatility.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero Ultra if you prioritize minimizing downtime and require the absolute fastest charging speeds available. This phone is ideal for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly replenish their battery throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Poco F5 Pro if you value consistent performance, gaming capabilities, and a balanced feature set. This is the better choice for power users, mobile gamers, and those who demand a reliable and responsive smartphone experience.