Infinix Zero Flip vs Xiaomi Mix Flip 2: A Deep Dive into Foldable Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 is the clear winner. Its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset offers a substantial performance advantage, coupled with the convenience of 50W wireless charging. However, the Infinix Zero Flip remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers who value blazing-fast 70W wired charging.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero Flip | Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 27 | 2025, June 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October | Available. Released 2025, June 26 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 170.4 x 73.4 x 7.6 mmFolded: 87.5 x 73.4 x 16 mm | Unfolded: 166.9 x 73.8 x 7.6 mmFolded: 86.1 x 73.8 x 15.9 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1224 x 2912 pixels (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.86 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1400 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 120Hz, 3200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 830 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 14.5 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, Leica lenses |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, Dolby Vision HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dolby Vision HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 70W wired 10W reverse wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4 50W wireless |
| Type | 4720 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5165 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | White, Purple, Green, Checkered Gold |
| Models | X6962 | 2505APX7BC |
| Price | ₹ 39,999 | About 720 EUR |
Infinix Zero Flip
- Blazing-fast 70W wired charging
- Competitive price point
- Good battery life (11:01h active use)
- Less powerful Dimensity 8020 chipset
- No wireless charging support
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
- Flagship Snapdragon 8 Elite performance
- 50W wireless charging support
- Likely superior display quality
- Slower wired charging (67W) compared to Infinix
- Higher price tag
Display Comparison
Detailed display specifications are missing, but both devices likely employ flexible AMOLED panels. The key differentiator will be peak brightness and color accuracy. Given Xiaomi’s history with high-end displays, the Mix Flip 2 likely boasts superior brightness and potentially a wider color gamut. The presence of LTPO technology in the Mix Flip 2 is probable, enabling adaptive refresh rates for improved battery efficiency. Bezels will be a critical visual factor, and real-world testing is needed to determine which device minimizes them more effectively.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Mix Flip 2’s flagship positioning suggests a more sophisticated camera system. Sensor size is crucial; a larger sensor captures more light, resulting in better low-light performance. The Mix Flip 2 likely incorporates advanced image processing algorithms and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor. While the Zero Flip may offer acceptable image quality, the Mix Flip 2 is expected to deliver more consistent and detailed results, particularly in challenging conditions. We'll disregard the likely presence of low-resolution macro lenses on both devices.
Performance
The performance gap is significant. The Xiaomi Mix Flip 2’s Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) is a powerhouse, featuring a custom Oryon CPU architecture with peak clock speeds of 4.32 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Infinix Zero Flip’s Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm), which, while capable, operates at lower clock speeds (2.6 GHz). The 3nm process node of the Snapdragon 8 Elite translates to superior power efficiency and thermal management, minimizing throttling during sustained workloads. Gamers and power users will overwhelmingly benefit from the Mix Flip 2’s processing prowess. The Mix Flip 2 will also likely feature faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing performance.
Battery Life
The Infinix Zero Flip’s 70W wired charging is its standout feature, promising incredibly fast top-ups. While the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 offers a respectable 67W wired charging with PD3.0 and QC4 support, the Zero Flip has a clear advantage in charging speed. However, the Mix Flip 2 compensates with 50W wireless charging, a feature absent on the Zero Flip. The Infinix Zero Flip’s active use score of 11:01h suggests good battery life, but the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s efficiency in the Mix Flip 2 could potentially offset any capacity differences, delivering comparable real-world endurance despite potentially having a smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero Flip if you need a foldable that charges incredibly quickly and offers a competitive price point, making it ideal for users who frequently top up their battery throughout the day. Buy the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 if you prefer a flagship-level processor for demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and appreciate the added convenience of wireless charging and a more refined overall experience.