Infinix Zero Flip vs Tecno Phantom V Flip2: Which Foldable Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 emerges as the slightly better choice. Its demonstrably brighter 893-nit display and longer 11:37-hour active use battery life provide a more refined experience, justifying the potential price premium. However, the Infinix Zero Flip remains a compelling option for those prioritizing value.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero Flip | Tecno Phantom V Flip2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 27 | 2024, September 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October | Available. Released 2024, October |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Eco leather back, aluminum frame, steel hinge |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 170.4 x 73.4 x 7.6 mmFolded: 87.5 x 73.4 x 16 mm | Unfolded: 170.8 x 73.4 x 7.6 mmFolded: 87.8 x 73.4 x 16 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 196 g (6.91 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~85.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1400 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 14.5 | Android 14, HIOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, 114˚ (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, PDAF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 70W wired 10W reverse wired | 70W wired, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 45 min |
| Type | 4720 mAh | 4720 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Travertine Green, Moondust Grey |
| Models | X6962 | - |
| Price | ₹ 39,999 | - |
Infinix Zero Flip
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Solid performance with Dimensity 8020
- 70W fast charging
- Lower display brightness (likely)
- Slightly shorter battery life
- Limited display specification details
Tecno Phantom V Flip2
- Brighter 893-nit display for outdoor visibility
- Longer battery life (11:37h active use)
- Faster charging times specified (50% in 15 min)
- Potentially higher price
- Similar chipset to Infinix Zero Flip
- Camera specs largely unknown
Display Comparison
The Tecno Phantom V Flip2 boasts a significant advantage in display technology, achieving a measured peak brightness of 893 nits. This is a crucial difference for users who frequently use their phones outdoors or in brightly lit environments, where the Infinix Zero Flip’s unspecified brightness will likely struggle. While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the higher brightness of the Tecno suggests superior panel quality and potentially better visibility. The absence of detailed display specs for the Infinix Zero Flip (like refresh rate or PWM dimming) leaves questions unanswered regarding its overall visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specifications are missing for both devices, making a direct comparison challenging. However, focusing on the likely market positioning, we can infer that both will prioritize software processing over cutting-edge hardware. The absence of information regarding sensor size and optical image stabilization (OIS) suggests neither phone will excel in low-light photography. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely a marketing tactic, offering limited practical benefit due to the small sensor size and lack of detail. Image processing style will likely be the key differentiator, with Tecno often leaning towards more vibrant, saturated colors.
Performance
Both the Infinix Zero Flip and the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 are powered by the Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6nm), featuring an octa-core CPU configuration with 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means raw processing power will be nearly identical for tasks like app launching, web browsing, and social media. The real-world performance difference will likely hinge on thermal management, which isn't specified for either device. However, given the similar chipsets and form factors, sustained performance under heavy load should be comparable. Both devices likely utilize LPDDR5x RAM, further minimizing performance bottlenecks.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key differentiator. The Tecno Phantom V Flip2 edges out the Infinix Zero Flip with an active use score of 11:37 hours compared to 11:01 hours. While the difference isn't massive, it represents a noticeable improvement for all-day usability. Both phones support 70W wired charging, with the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 providing more specific charging times: 50% in 15 minutes and 100% in 45 minutes. The Infinix Zero Flip’s charging speed is only specified as 70W, lacking the granular detail offered by Tecno. Both also offer 10W reverse wired charging, useful for topping up accessories.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero Flip if you're a price-conscious consumer seeking a capable foldable experience without breaking the bank. It delivers solid performance and respectable battery life for everyday tasks. Buy the Tecno Phantom V Flip2 if you prioritize a brighter, more visible display for outdoor use and require the longest possible battery life during active use, even if it means spending a bit more.