Infinix Zero Flip vs Oppo Find N3 Flip: Which Flip Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find N3 Flip is the superior choice. Its significantly longer battery life (12:58h active use vs 11:01h) and more powerful Dimensity 9200 chipset justify the price premium, offering a smoother and more reliable experience. However, the Infinix Zero Flip presents a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero Flip | Oppo Find N3 Flip |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 20, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, September 27 | 2023, August 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 170.4 x 73.4 x 7.6 mmFolded: 87.5 x 73.4 x 16 mm | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm |
| SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 195 g (6.88 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1400 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, XOS 14.5 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.57", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 115˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF 48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 25mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.4, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 70W wired 10W reverse wired | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min Reverse wired |
| Type | 4720 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Rock Black, Blossom Glow | Cream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black |
| Models | X6962 | PHT110, CPH2519 |
| Price | ₹ 39,999 | About 1200 EUR |
Infinix Zero Flip
- More affordable price point
- Faster 70W wired charging
- Competitive chipset for everyday tasks
- Shorter battery life
- Less powerful chipset compared to Oppo
- Limited camera details
Oppo Find N3 Flip
- Superior battery life (12:58h active use)
- More powerful Dimensity 9200 chipset
- Brighter display with likely LTPO technology
- Higher price tag
- Slower 44W charging (compared to Infinix)
- Reverse wired charging only
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a notably brighter display, reaching a measured 939 nits. While the Infinix Zero Flip’s display specs aren’t provided, the Find N3 Flip’s higher peak brightness translates to better visibility outdoors. Both likely utilize AMOLED panels, but Oppo’s inclusion of LTPO technology (assumed based on brand history) would dynamically adjust the refresh rate, conserving battery. The larger cover screen on the N3 Flip also enhances usability without unfolding.
Camera Comparison
While both phones feature camera systems, detailed sensor information is limited for the Infinix Zero Flip. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s camera is likely to offer superior image quality due to its more advanced image signal processor (ISP) within the Dimensity 9200. The Oppo’s focus on both photo and video capabilities suggests a more versatile camera experience. The absence of detailed specs for the Zero Flip’s camera makes a direct comparison difficult, but it’s unlikely to match the Oppo’s capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4nm) is a significant step up from the Infinix Zero Flip’s Dimensity 8020 (6nm). The 4nm process node delivers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning less throttling during demanding tasks. The Dimensity 9200’s CPU configuration – 1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3, 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510 – provides a substantial performance advantage over the Zero Flip’s 4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. Gamers and multitasking users will see a clear benefit with the Oppo.
Battery Life
Battery life is a key differentiator. The Oppo Find N3 Flip’s active use score of 12:58h significantly surpasses the Infinix Zero Flip’s 11:01h. While the Infinix offers faster 70W wired charging, the Oppo’s 44W charging (50% in 23 minutes) is still respectable. The Oppo’s older endurance rating of 92h further reinforces its superior battery performance. The Dimensity 9200’s efficiency plays a crucial role in this advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero Flip if you prioritize affordability and are willing to make compromises on battery life and raw performance. It’s ideal for casual users who primarily need social media, messaging, and basic tasks. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you demand all-day battery life, a more responsive user experience thanks to the Dimensity 9200, and a brighter, more vibrant display. This is the phone for power users and those who want a premium foldable experience.