The Infinix Zero 8i and Oppo F17 Pro both target the competitive mid-range smartphone market, but approach it with different philosophies. The Zero 8i prioritizes raw processing power with its Helio G90T chipset, while the F17 Pro aims for a more balanced experience with the Helio P95 and a focus on design and fast charging. This comparison will dissect their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing gaming and demanding tasks, the Infinix Zero 8i emerges as the winner. Its Helio G90T chipset offers a noticeable performance edge. However, the Oppo F17 Pro provides a more refined experience with slightly faster charging and a potentially more polished software experience, making it a strong contender for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | India | - |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2020, December 03. Released 2020, December 09 | 2020, September 02. Released 2020, September 07 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm (6.64 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) | 160.1 x 73.8 x 7.5 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210.5 g (7.44 oz) | 164 g (5.78 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~408 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.85 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 100.3 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 480 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6779V Helio P95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | PowerVR GM9446 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10, ColorOS 7.2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | 48 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF
8 MP, 119˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Dual | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide)
8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (depth) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 30W wired, 50% in 30 min, 100% in 53 min |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 4015 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Silver Diamond, Black Diamond | Magic Blue, Matte Black, Metallic White |
| Models | X687B | CPH2119 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 270 EUR |
| SAR | 0.40 W/kg (head) 0.95 W/kg (body) | 1.44 W/kg (head) 1.41 W/kg (body) |
| Pricing |
|---|
| 128GB 8GB RAM | - | ₹ 17,990 |
Infinix Zero 8i
- More powerful Helio G90T chipset for gaming
- Faster 33W wired charging
- Potentially better image processing due to G90T ISP
- Software experience may be less refined than Oppo
- Unknown battery capacity
Oppo F17 Pro
- Potentially more polished software experience (Oppo's ColorOS)
- Faster charging time to 100% (53 minutes)
- ₹17,990 price point (128GB/8GB variant)
- Less powerful Helio P95 chipset for demanding tasks
- Slightly slower charging wattage (30W)
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price point, both likely utilize IPS LCD panels. The focus here will be on performance. The chipset's ability to drive higher refresh rates (if supported by the display) will be a key differentiator, favoring the Zero 8i's more powerful GPU.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the chipset's ISP (Image Signal Processor) plays a role. The G90T's ISP is optimized for handling higher resolution sensors and faster image processing, potentially giving the Zero 8i an edge in low-light photography and video recording. The F17 Pro's P95 ISP is capable, but likely less optimized for demanding camera tasks. The presence or absence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant factor, but is unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Zero 8i’s MediaTek Helio G90T (12nm) features a dual-core Cortex-A76 setup clocked at 2.05 GHz, paired with six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architecture is geared towards sustained performance, crucial for gaming. The Oppo F17 Pro’s Helio P95 (12nm) uses a dual-core Cortex-A75 configuration clocked slightly higher at 2.2 GHz, alongside six Cortex-A55 cores at 2.0 GHz. While the A75 cores offer a slight clock speed advantage, the G90T’s A76 cores generally provide superior single-core and multi-core performance, especially in graphically demanding applications. This translates to smoother frame rates and faster loading times in games for the Zero 8i.
Battery Life
Both phones offer fast charging, with the Infinix Zero 8i boasting 33W wired charging and the Oppo F17 Pro offering 30W. Oppo claims 50% charge in 30 minutes and 100% in 53 minutes. While the Zero 8i's charging speed is slightly higher, the difference is unlikely to be dramatically noticeable in real-world usage. The actual battery capacity of both devices is unknown, but the faster charging of the Zero 8i could offset a potentially smaller battery size.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 8i if you need a phone primarily for gaming, video editing, or other resource-intensive tasks. The G90T chipset will provide a smoother experience in these scenarios. Buy the Oppo F17 Pro if you prefer a phone with a more balanced feature set, prioritizing design, fast charging, and a potentially more streamlined user interface. It's ideal for social media, photography, and general daily use.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Infinix Zero 8i's Helio G90T handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Helio G90T is specifically designed for gaming. It should comfortably run PUBG Mobile at high settings with stable frame rates, although sustained performance may be affected by thermal throttling depending on the phone's cooling solution.
❓ How does Oppo's ColorOS compare to Infinix's UI in terms of bloatware and user experience?
Oppo's ColorOS is generally considered to be more refined and feature-rich than Infinix's UI, but it often comes with a significant amount of pre-installed bloatware. Infinix's UI tends to be lighter but may lack some of the advanced features found in ColorOS. User preference will play a large role here.
❓ Is the 30W charging on the Oppo F17 Pro significantly slower than the 33W charging on the Infinix Zero 8i in real-world use?
While the Infinix Zero 8i has a slightly higher charging wattage, the difference in charging speed is unlikely to be dramatic. Oppo's 30W charging is still very fast, reaching 100% in 53 minutes, and the difference of a few minutes won't be noticeable for most users.
