Infinix Zero 8 vs. Motorola Moto G 5G Plus: Which 5G Phone Reigns Supreme?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and potentially more raw gaming performance, the Infinix Zero 8 is the better choice. Its 33W charging significantly outperforms the Moto G 5G Plus’s 20W, and the Helio G90T offers a slight edge in GPU power. However, the Moto G 5G Plus benefits from a more efficient chipset.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 8 | Motorola Moto G 5G Plus |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 66 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2020, August 27. Released 2020, August 31 | 2020, July 07. Released 2020, July 08 |
| Status | Discontinued | Discontinued |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.1 x 9.1 mm (6.64 x 3.00 x 0.36 in) | 168.3 x 74 x 9.7 mm (6.63 x 2.91 x 0.38 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 205 g (7.23 oz) | 207 g (7.30 oz) |
| - | Water-repellent coating | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~392 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.85 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz, HDR10 |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.3 GHz Kryo 475 Prime & 1x2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7250 Snapdragon 765 5G (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 | Adreno 620 |
| OS | Android 10 | Android 10 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 2.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.3, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Auxiliary lenses | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm 5 MP (macro), AF Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 5 MP, f/2.8, AF | - |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.0, 29mm (normal), 1.0µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | VGA | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Browser | HTML, Adobe Flash | - |
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 20W wired |
| Stand-by | Up to 400 h | - |
| Talk time | Up to 9 h 48 min | - |
| Type | 4500 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Silver Diamond, Black Diamond, Green Diamond | Surfing Blue, Mystic Lilac |
| Models | X687 | XT2075, XT2075-2, XT2075-3 |
| Price | About 210 EUR | About 260 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Audio quality | Noise -84.7dB / Crosstalk -82.5dB | - |
| Battery life | Endurance rating 116h | Endurance rating 114h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 2184:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1269:1 |
| Loudspeaker | -28.4 LUFS (Average) | -28.4 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 282348 (v8) GeekBench: 6640 (v4.4), 1663 (v5.1) GFXBench: 15fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 299926 (v8) GeekBench: 1898 (v5.1) GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero 8
- Faster 33W charging
- Potentially better gaming performance with Helio G90T
- Higher display contrast ratio
- Less power-efficient chipset
- Display brightness not specified
Motorola Moto G 5G Plus
- More power-efficient Snapdragon 765 chipset
- Higher measured display brightness
- Cleaner software experience
- Slower 20W charging
- Lower display contrast ratio
Display Comparison
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus boasts a measured peak brightness of 543 nits, a significant advantage over the Infinix Zero 8’s unspecified brightness, suggesting better outdoor visibility. However, the Zero 8 counters with a substantially higher contrast ratio of 2184:1 compared to the Moto G 5G Plus’s 1269:1, promising deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. While both are adequate, the Zero 8’s contrast ratio suggests a more visually immersive experience, though the Moto G 5G Plus’s higher brightness is a practical benefit.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. The focus should be on image processing. Motorola typically aims for a more natural color profile, while Infinix often boosts saturation. Without sample images, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner. The absence of specific details like sensor size and aperture makes a detailed comparison challenging, but the presence of 'Photo/Video' capabilities on both suggests a similar level of functionality. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro lenses on either device is questionable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Infinix Zero 8 utilizes the Mediatek Helio G90T (12nm), while the Moto G 5G Plus features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 5G (7nm). The Snapdragon 765’s 7nm process offers superior power efficiency, translating to potentially longer battery life during sustained use. However, the Helio G90T’s octa-core CPU, with its two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, and Mali-G76 MC4 GPU, provides a slight edge in raw gaming performance. The Snapdragon 765’s Kryo cores are well-balanced, but the G90T is specifically tuned for gaming. The Moto G 5G Plus benefits from Qualcomm’s 5G modem integration, potentially offering more stable 5G connectivity.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of approximately 114-116 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Infinix Zero 8’s 33W wired charging is a clear advantage over the Moto G 5G Plus’s 20W charging. This translates to significantly faster top-up times, reducing downtime. While the Snapdragon 765’s efficiency might slightly offset the smaller charging wattage, the Zero 8’s faster charging is a more tangible benefit for most users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 8 if you need a phone geared towards mobile gaming and value rapid charging speeds. Its Helio G90T chipset and 33W charging are ideal for gamers and those constantly on the move. Buy the Motorola Moto G 5G Plus if you prioritize battery efficiency and a more color-accurate display, and prefer a cleaner software experience with Motorola’s near-stock Android.