Infinix Zero 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G: Which 5G Phone Delivers More?
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a potentially smoother software experience, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the better choice. Its 67W charging significantly outperforms the Infinix Zero 5G’s 33W, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a stable, if not groundbreaking, performance profile.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 5G | Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - X6815 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - X6815 | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - X6815B | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 08 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.05 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits (peak) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 2 MP | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version 8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Skylight Orange, Horizon Blue | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | X6815, X6815B | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 250 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 140h | Endurance rating 119h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1610:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.6 LUFS (Good) | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 419083 (v8), 487639 (v9) GeekBench: 2169 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9) GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero 5G
- Potentially higher CPU performance due to Cortex-A78 cores
- Higher measured peak display brightness (499 nits)
- Slightly better battery endurance rating (140h)
- Slower 33W charging
- Less refined software experience (potentially)
- Dimensity 900 may be more prone to throttling
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- More stable and efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Potentially better contrast ratio with VA panel
- Lower battery endurance rating (119h)
- Lower peak CPU performance
- Unspecified display brightness
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a nominal contrast ratio, but the Poco X4 Pro 5G claims an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, suggesting a VA panel, while the Infinix Zero 5G lists a 1610:1 contrast ratio, indicating an IPS LCD. The Infinix Zero 5G’s measured peak brightness of 499 nits is a concrete figure, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s brightness remains unspecified. This suggests the Infinix Zero 5G may be more visible in direct sunlight. However, the panel technology difference impacts viewing angles and black levels, favoring the Poco X4 Pro 5G for media consumption.
Camera Comparison
Both devices list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, offering little concrete detail. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, given the market positioning, it’s likely both phones rely on similar sensor tiers. The absence of specific camera details suggests neither phone is a standout performer in photography, focusing instead on providing a versatile camera experience for casual users. The usefulness of any included 2MP macro lenses on either device is questionable.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Infinix Zero 5G utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6nm) with its octa-core configuration featuring two high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) with a slightly lower peak clock speed of 2.2 GHz on its Kryo 660 Gold cores. While the Dimensity 900’s A78 cores offer a theoretical performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks, the Snapdragon 695 is known for its efficient power consumption and stable performance. The 6nm process node is shared, suggesting similar thermal characteristics, but the Dimensity 900 may be more prone to throttling under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Infinix Zero 5G boasts an endurance rating of 140 hours, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G achieves 119 hours. However, this difference is largely offset by the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s significantly faster 67W charging. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can reach 70% charge in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, a substantial advantage over the Infinix Zero 5G’s 33W charging. This means the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s lower endurance rating is mitigated by its ability to quickly top up the battery, making it more convenient for users who frequently need to recharge.
Buying Guide
Buy the Infinix Zero 5G if you prioritize raw CPU performance for demanding tasks and potentially benefit from the Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 cores. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value faster charging speeds, a more refined user experience (potentially due to Xiaomi’s MIUI), and a more consistent, though slightly less powerful, overall performance profile.