Infinix Zero 5G vs Xiaomi Poco X3 GT: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco X3 GT takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, more powerful chipset, and slightly brighter display. While the Infinix Zero 5G boasts impressive battery endurance, the Poco X3 GT's overall performance and charging speed make it the more appealing choice for most users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Infinix Zero 5G | Xiaomi Poco X3 GT |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 17, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - X6815 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 42 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - X6815 | 1, 3, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| 1, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - X6815B | - | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, February 08 | 2021, July 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, March 03 | Available. Released 2021, August 19 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.7 x 76.5 x 8.8 mm (6.64 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 163.3 x 75.9 x 8.9 mm (6.43 x 2.99 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 199 g (7.05 oz) | 193 g (6.81 oz) |
| - | IP53, dust and splash resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~399 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 500 nits (peak) | IPS LCD, 120Hz, HDR10, 450 nits (typ) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1100 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, XOS 10.6 | Android 11, MIUI 12.5 for POCO |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.5, 50mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.12µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 2 MP | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/2.76", 1.12µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, 720p@120fps, 960fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio Tuned by JBL | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| - | Virtual proximity sensing | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Cosmic Black, Skylight Orange, Horizon Blue | Stargaze Black, Wave Blue, Cloud White |
| Models | X6815, X6815B | 21061110AG |
| Price | About 250 EUR | About 150 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.05 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.58 W/kg (head) 0.94 W/kg (body) |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 140h | Endurance rating 110h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: 1610:1 (nominal) | Contrast ratio: 1425:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -27.6 LUFS (Good) | -28.5 LUFS (Average) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 419083 (v8), 487639 (v9) GeekBench: 2169 (v5.1) GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 506800 (v8) | 578505 (v9) GeekBench: 2310 (v5.1) GFXBench: 38fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Infinix Zero 5G
- Exceptional battery life
- Good display contrast
- Smooth user experience
- Slower charging
- Less powerful chipset
- Potentially struggles with demanding games
Xiaomi Poco X3 GT
- Fast charging (67W)
- Powerful Dimensity 1100 chipset
- Brighter display
- Good value for money
- Shorter battery life compared to Zero 5G
- Design might not appeal to everyone
Display Comparison
Both phones feature vibrant displays, but the Poco X3 GT edges ahead. It boasts a slightly higher contrast ratio (1425:1 vs 1610:1 - nominal, though the Infinix's measured ratio is impressive) and a brighter peak brightness of 537 nits compared to the Infinix's 499 nits. While both offer good viewing angles, the Poco X3 GT's extra brightness makes it more comfortable to use outdoors.
Camera Comparison
Camera performance is generally comparable, as both phones offer decent photo and video capabilities. However, detailed camera tests are needed to determine a clear winner. Both likely offer similar features like night mode and portrait mode. The Poco X3 GT might have a slight edge in video recording due to its more powerful processor.
Performance
The Xiaomi Poco X3 GT's Mediatek Dimensity 1100 chipset is noticeably faster than the Infinix Zero 5G's Dimensity 900. The Dimensity 1100's superior CPU configuration (4x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 vs 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78) translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. The Poco X3 GT handles demanding games with ease, while the Zero 5G might struggle with the highest settings.
Battery Life
The Infinix Zero 5G shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 140 hours, significantly outperforming the Poco X3 GT's 110h. However, the Poco X3 GT compensates with its blazing-fast 67W charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 42 minutes – a massive advantage over the Zero 5G's 33W charging.
Buying Guide
The Infinix Zero 5G is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a smooth, albeit less powerful, experience. The Xiaomi Poco X3 GT is perfect for gamers and power users who demand fast performance, rapid charging, and a vibrant display.